Current EX trial completed without Healers

[Sebazy]

That "Thanks" at the end of your post is certainly, totally, absolutely not snarky at all.

Then I suggest you get a grip of both your feelings and the English language itself before you come here swinging big words around like they mean anything.

You're welcome to, though I don't know what you're getting at. You're mad because I play UNO card on others?

No, because you are clinically incapable of accepting when you are wrong.

Case in point: I corrected a statement of yours here

It's a trait you share with a few people on here. Funnily enough the same tiny little group that does their utmost to decry, discredit and derail so much of the conversation here.

I look forward to you arguing your way out of that one. Make it entertaining.

Thanks

[Aword3213]

Then I suggest you get a grip of both your feelings and the English language itself before you come here swinging big words around like they mean anything.

Just because my reply towards you was mainly focus on my original topic and you seemed butthurt about it. Like there was no "desperately trying to find some kind of personal attack in everything I say" How about you read my reply thoroughly and get over with your feelings first, hum? Or is it me refusing to answer your suggestive question that makes you mad? However. it is indeed a suggestive question as I later explained. Maybe if you rephrase it better and I would have answered that. You made a clarification later and things could have end it there. I was about to apologize, but oh no, you're so eager to pick up fight that you edited your post before I could react to your clarification.

About English language part , yeah, it's very difficult for me to understand what you were trying to say in previous posts. Perhaps it's because of your wording, or sentence structure? I don't know. Perhaps it's me getting old. I find it hard to understand such a well- constructed sentence such as "I'm not trying to suggest that they are making statements that they are not" made by an English expert like you. I'll definetly work hard on that. Thanks for your elaborate explanation later in the post. Too bad you just can't stop the eagerness to belittle me.

No, because you are clinically incapable of accepting when you are wrong.
Case in point: I corrected a statement of yours herepost

You're terribly wrong. I've admitted mistake before in other posts. https://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/...71#post5661471

Apparently, you're wrong about "clinically incapable of accepting when you are wrong" Are you ready to admit mistake and apologize? If not, I'm afraid you will be the one that's clincically incapable of accepting when you're wrong.

Now you're the one who threw personsal attack and brought your temper to the other thread. Nice job for making a correction reply without giviing time for others to respond, and use it as proof to make your point.

Just shows how manipulative you are.

It's a trait you share with a few people on here. Funnily enough the same tiny little group that does their utmost to decry, discredit and derail so much of the conversation here.
I look forward to you arguing your way out of that one.

Wow, so many offensive words all at once. I get you. Nice trait you have there. Very common amongst forum goers.

umm..iirc you're the one that do the derailing. You see, my previous replies were all about the topic which directly correspond with other replies, until you came along and brought about your view and feeling about the interview during Media Tour, which I addressed. Now you resorted to get offensive and brought you temper to my reply in other post. Disappointing.

And no. I'm not going "argue my way out of that one" Contrary to what you surmised, I'm not afraid to admit mistakes. So I'll just say it here. I was wrong about stating healers can solo any dungeons, and I'm sorry for making claims when I haven't tried soloing any EW dungeons.

Despite that, I still don't think you actully did "corrected me." Adimittely I jumped to the conclusion without testing myself, but it's not correction when you did not provide any video proof. Ther criteria also seemed deliberately chosen by you. Why AST? have you tried other healers? Have tried Vitality Tinctures? How does DRK fare in the arguemnt regarding tanks soloing.? Can DRK solo any dungeons as well?

Well, "correction" is a poor choice of word in this case.

does their utmost to decry, discredit

do you mean this person?

Ok, the trolling is getting a little bit blatant now

Have you actually tested your claims? Do you have anything to cite that confirms this? I don't think you do.

If you did you'd know that The Dead End Peacekeeper's Elimination tank buster hits for 50k+ on a caster without mitigation. As AST I can survive one with literally everything on myself. I can't survive two back to back because I need both Neutral Sect and CI to survive the hit+auto or I just get one shot.

By the way, while we're at it. Would you be so kind as to educate me with proofs that tanks can solo any dungeons. By any I mean every single dungeon that is soloed by every tank within tank roles . Since you're so good at finding evidence, we really need videos showcasing every tank being able to solo every single dungeon. You know, for the sake of the solidifying the claims made by the thread you linked. I expect your questioning spirit works on both sides of the arguements, for the betterment of the community of course

[Sebazy]

By the way, while we're at it. Would you be so kind as to educate me with proofs that tanks can solo any dungeons. By any I mean every single dungeon that is soloed by every tank within tank roles . Since you're so good at finding evidence, we really need videos showcasing every tank being able to solo every single dungeon. You know, for the sake of the solidifying the claims made by the thread you linked. I expect your questioning spirit works on both sides of the arguements, for the betterment of the community of course

No thanks, I've put down plenty of proof whenever I have taken a stance on something. I'm not here to do your dirty work for you.

Also there's a lot of words in that post above, and they all seem to skirt around the fact that you're clearly and verifiably wrong in the post I linked.

Strange that. It's almost like you're confirming exactly what I'm saying.

Stay mad sir.

[Aword3213]

No thanks, I've put down plenty of proof whenever I have taken a stance on something. I'm not here to do your dirty work for you.

Also there's a lot of words in that post above, and they all seem to skirt around the fact that you're clearly and verifiably wrong in the post I linked.

Strange that. It's almost like you're confirming exactly what I'm saying.

Stay mad sir.

uhh..that's it? seemed you're clinically incapable of accepting when you are wrong.

Anyway, this is expected. Have a nice day then.

[Zelarned]

uhh..that's it? seemed you're clinically incapable of accepting when you are wrong.

Anyway, this is expected. Have a nice day then.

Maybe it's because you keep moving a goal posts the distances of galaxies and practice mental gymnastics that makes a contortionist blush. Not a lot of people are willing to put up with someone as stubborn and dishonest as yours.

"A is not true."
"Actually, A is true- here's proof!"
"Well, what about B? That's not true."
"Actually, here's proof for B's authenticity"
"Come on now, Sure, B is true but C can't be either!"
...
"See? You can't prove Z, I WIN! [Insert passive aggressive parting phrase here]"

It's a funny game, the only winning move's not to play.

[Aword3213]

Maybe it's because you keep moving a goal posts the distances of galaxies and practice mental gymnastics that makes a contortionist blush. Not a lot of people are willing to put up with someone as stubborn and dishonest as yours.

"A is not true."
"Actually, A is true- here's proof!"
"Well, what about B? That's not true."
"Actually, here's proof for B's authenticity"
"Come on now, Sure, B is true but C can't be either!"
...
"See? You can't prove Z, I WIN! [Insert passive aggressive parting phrase here]"

It's a funny game, the only winning move's not to play.

You're almost right, but unfortunately the "correction" Sebazy made was questionable too.

She requested proofs to back up my claims, yet all she did was providing a statement without any evidence.

My tone would certainly change if she actually corrected my claims. Alas, she did not, but I apologize anyway. Unfortunately, such trait is not commonly seen in here.

It's not like I'd expect her to fall for my virtue signaling, just as I didn't fall for her suggestive question. It was meant to show how she disengenously claimed how she corrected me and then use it as an insult before I could react to it.

At least I didn't throw insult as she did to me, yet you're talking about being passive aggressive.