Binary code is entirely applicable, because we use it everyday to view many millions of things. Each value composed of the binary represents entirely different information with respect to what a computer shows us. It goes a similar way with sexual chromosomes, though actual biology is a lot messier.
You'll notice your sliding scale is still contained within a binary, as it has two poles. It is a binary scale. Everything on the scale is informed and described by its poles.
It's also labeled incorrectly. The intersex portion should touch the poles, as it is entirely possible to be M or F with an exact 46 XY or XX chromosome comp, but due to physical defect, develop as one or the other.
Until we get a mutation that causes an intersex person to develop with a brand new sex chromosome, we humans will be sexually binary.
Gender is entirely psychological, as it was invented in relation to sex to distinguish between what a person is physically, and what they feel/think that they are. It has no bearing on my point.
Last edited by Vyrerus; 05-14-2021 at 04:50 PM. Reason: so -> to, darn fingers, I've got Ethan Winters hands
(Signature portrait by Amaipetisu)
"I thought that my invincible power would hold the world captive, leaving me in a freedom undisturbed. Thus night and day I worked at the chain with huge fires and cruel hard strokes. When at last the work was done and the links were complete and unbreakable, I found that it held me in its grip." - Rabindranath Tagore
I drew that with my finger, just take it as a vague approximation.Binary code is entirely applicable, because we use it everyday to view many millions of things. Each value composed of the binary represents entirely different information with respect to what a computer shows us. It goes a similar way with sexual chromosomes, though actual biology is a lot messier.
You'll notice your sliding scale is still contained within a binary, as it has two poles. It is a binary scale. Everything on the scale is informed and described by its poles.
It's also labeled incorrectly. The intersex portion should touch the poles, as it is entirely possible to be M or F with an exact 46 XY or XX chromosome comp, but due to physical defect, develop as one or the other.
Until we get a mutation that causes an intersex person to develop with a brand new sex chromosome, we humans will be sexually binary.
Gender is entirely psychological, as it was invented in relation so sex to distinguish between what a person is physically, and what they feel/think that they are. It has no bearing on my point.
On the rest of your post: sure, it exists within a binary, but it isnt a strict either or.
Also the gender comments are more for anyone else choosing to read through the thread. I find you to be someone who is typically level headed about this kind of stuff, which I appreciate.
Seeing as how videogame journalism as a whole is a joke with most sites not even hiring qualified people this WILL become the norm eventually.
Like I can totally see a journalist from a site like IGN giving the critically acclaimed mmorpg ffxiv with a free trial up to level 60 including the heavensward expansion a bad review just because they couldn't make it past the opening cutscene due to not using the proper pronouns.
It's better than I can draw with a pencil, heh. I've got pretty bad hands.I drew that with my finger, just take it as a vague approximation.
On the rest of your post: sure, it exists within a binary, but it isnt a strict either or.
Also the gender comments are more for anyone else choosing to read through the thread. I find you to be someone who is typically level headed about this kind of stuff, which I appreciate.
It exists within the binary, and that means that it's both but never neither.
Thanks for the compliment. I was actually feeling somewhat riled, honestly. I feel pretty strongly about this kind of stuff. I'm fine with people choosing their own descriptors, as it's something intersex people have to do naturally. I just draw the line at changing the definition of sex, which exists entirely for the physical world. At least, changing it without there first being an example of it actually changing, in this case, for humans.
(Signature portrait by Amaipetisu)
"I thought that my invincible power would hold the world captive, leaving me in a freedom undisturbed. Thus night and day I worked at the chain with huge fires and cruel hard strokes. When at last the work was done and the links were complete and unbreakable, I found that it held me in its grip." - Rabindranath Tagore
No problem. I kind of feel that we're both hitting a wall, because while we're not necessarily in full *disagreement* with each other (we're playing semantics at this point) we're also not going to come to a full agreement on what we do disagree upon. I'm going to end this here before it devolves into nitpicking, as I'm prone to do.It's better than I can draw with a pencil, heh. I've got pretty bad hands.
It exists within the binary, and that means that it's both but never neither.
Thanks for the compliment. I was actually feeling somewhat riled, honestly. I feel pretty strongly about this kind of stuff. I'm fine with people choosing their own descriptors, as it's something intersex people have to do naturally. I just draw the line at changing the definition of sex, which exists entirely for the physical world. At least, changing it without there first being an example of it actually changing, in this case, for humans.
Have a great day, and I hope to see you elsewhere on the forums!
![]()
And why not? If you personally wish to have NPCs refer to you as "she" or "her", that's you. If someone else wishes to make a female avatar and have the pronouns be "he" or "him" when talking to NPCs, how does this affect you? (In a hypothetical where this doesn't take away from dev resources).
It doesn't mean you have to refer to others differently. This is an invisible feature, it doesn't affect others gameplay.
Cause I rather the devs not waste time on implementing a feature no one will see or use. Like you said, it will only be visible for the player, it doesn't add anything.
It would just be a "woke" list where they can check off a box. It's stupid if you ask me. We have to much of that in real life today with social media.
Cause I rather the devs not waste time on implementing a feature no one will see or use. Like you said, it will only be visible for the player, it doesn't add anything.
It would just be a "woke" list where they can check off a box. It's stupid if you ask me. We have to much of that in real life today with social media.There, dev resources are not wasted. Now why are you against other players being referred to by their preferred pronoun in game?(In a hypothetical where this doesn't take away from dev resources)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.