Lack of End Game Content

[CazzT]

No, because the actual numbers are very important. If you are going to dismiss people with 1% when in fact you could be referencing 30%. if possibly 30% then that is a very large share of the capital. too condense it down to "1%" is a straight up lie with no further argument needed. So yes, I would like the specific number so people can stop throwing around factually incorrect data.

exactly like how these people are condensing it down to "1%" to dismiss others.

You will never get the specific number unless you get a job at SE working in specific departments or SE gives us some numbers.
No one is dismissing the calls for more content. People are pointing out that adding content for a small group is not good business when you could make content that the majority will enjoy. That's not being dismissive, that's stating reality.