well and thats one of your mistakes - u think I'm just pro smn whats not the case, I play heal and brd as well from time to time - tho this is not "I'm smn and all the others can suck my balls" mentality. also its not me who always bring that smn vs. xyz back on the table if I say something general to raiding. my very first comment in this thread was kinda neutral - but just because my profile says I'm smn Zera began to strike on that, what actually was totally unrelated to:
a general opinion about raiding and one which has nothing to do with the op-ness of smns or other specific cls'.
But im not gonna lie: on the other hand at this state yeah I'm happy to be smn cause we perform good and finally have fun in savage too. whoop whoop. :3 - (thats why I said finally & mentioned the past thats all.)
but I was happy in arr & hw as well and I will stick to smn in 5.0 as well even if we are back to bottom like we were used to be. I don't chose my main based on fflogs performance or raidspots. I play smn cause I like pet cls in mmos. switching mains to perform "best" is just another personal problem of people who can't stand mid or bottom. but often the things those people complain about are actually not that important/relevant in an objective point of view - f.e. "good blm do high dmg, can clear all savage tier and even ultimate" this is true no doubt around it everything else in this thread is personal ego driven - easy like that.
if people always want to be on top - there is no way around switching cls from tier to tier - easy like that again... : /
and whats the matter with "holding back the grp" if you play with your static & friends? another argument which lose weight somehow... oh pf I see... yeah pf... if someone goes savage via pf the whole speedkill/meta/raidbuffs talk is obsolete... so why exactly do u have a bad feeling "holding your grp back" by playing what you personal like most? : /