Forum etiquette - double-posting vs separating ideas?

[KaivaC]

snip

Umm... No, it does not. It's for reading convenience. When those of us use mobile, snipping posts allows us to avoid hitting the post limit since we can't edit on mobile. Sometimes, don't want to have a huge wall of texts when posting a reply, so it's snipped. It's not rude at all. That's a huge reach you've made there.

[Miste]

There are studies on this, don't be ridiculous. Anonymity makes people act differently than they would in a physical setting, because anonymity lowers inhibition.

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9ea...f0452c75e6.pdf
http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/59830/1/Accepted%20Version.pdf

Hyo already explained it, but figured I should tell you too.

Those studies have nothing to do with what I called you out on. Who even said anything about lower inhibitions and anonymity? I called you out on generalizing westerners as all ego inflated people who just post to be seen.

Read this carefully: Those studies don't say anything about westerners being all ego inflated and just seeking online fame. Just as an FYI neither of those articles even have the word "ego", "western", or "westerner" in them at all so honestly I am guessing you didn't even read this so called proof about your claim that westerners are all ego inflated fame seekers.

You're doing that thing I told you before about multiple times. Someone calls you out on some nonsense that you claim and you resort to replying with things that have nothing to do with the reply you received. Stahp.

[347SPECTRE]

Why is this a thing?

[KisaiTenshi]

I suppose I have to repeat myself

This is ****-posting.

Hyo already explained it, but figured I should tell you too.

The very definition of ****-posting.

Neither of you needed to add to the thread, but you did anyway, knowing that I'm going to ignore your hostile language posts anyway.

Umm... No, it does not. It's for reading convenience. When those of us use mobile, snipping posts allows us to avoid hitting the post limit since we can't edit on mobile. Sometimes, don't want to have a huge wall of texts when posting a reply, so it's snipped. It's not rude at all. That's a huge reach you've made there.

And thus that's why some threads have circular arguments. If you "snip"'d the context, it makes you belligerent towards the poster, and the will be taken as such.

[HyoMinPark]

This is ****-posting.

The very definition of ****-posting.

If mine and Miste’s posts are sh*t-posts, what does that make your gross generalization of westerners? Miste and I are telling you to stop being rude. And also repeating things we have said since you completely ignored them; that’s not sh*t-posting.

Neither of you needed to add to the thread, but you did anyway, knowing that I'm going to ignore your hostile language posts anyway.

And your generalizations were needed? How did they add to the conversation? I’m sorry, you tell others to put a pin in their egos, but I think you should probably check your own.

And thus that's why some threads have circular arguments. If you "snip"'d the context, it makes you belligerent towards the poster, and the will be taken as such.

Threads enter circular arguments because people choose not to listen to what others are saying. Or are stubborn. They don’t become circular because people use “snip” in quotes. If you interpret “snipping” quotes as belligerent, then that seems like an issue you should deal with. It certainly doesn’t apply to everyone.

[KisaiTenshi]

If mine and Miste’s posts are sh*t-posts, what does that make your gross generalization of westerners? Miste and I are telling you to stop being rude. And also repeating things we have said since you completely ignored them; that’s not sh*t-posting.

Respect is earned, not given. People you think I'm being rude to, were already rude to me or others in the past.

You Either Die A Hero, Or You Live Long Enough To See Yourself Become The Villain

[KaivaC]

And thus that's why some threads have circular arguments. If you "snip"'d the context, it makes you belligerent towards the poster, and the will be taken as such.

And thus, the reach goes even further. It does not make the responder belligerent for simply snipping a post. It's one thing if you don't like your posts being snipped, but its another to say that the responder is belligerent for simply snipping. The context of their response would make them belligerent, not the fact that they are shortening the quoted text for convenience's sake. Case in point:

This is ****-posting.

This is a prime example of being belligerent. Especially for no reason.

[HyoMinPark]

Respect is earned, not given. People you think I'm being rude to, were already rude to me or others in the past.

You Either Die A Hero, Or You Live Long Enough To See Yourself Become The Villain

My post has nothing to do with respect; it’s about you ignoring what people are saying. Though that certainly does prove to be a show of complete and utter disrespect. The comment about being rude was with regards to your generalizations; those are rude, as others have already said.

What are you even getting at? Again with the completely unrelated responses. It’s clear we cannot have an actual conversation since, again, you are ignoring what I’m saying, and choosing instead to insert some completely off-topic narrative/response. Have a nice evening.

[MoroMurasaki]

snip

You don't see anything wrong with making sweeping negative generalizations about people based on nothing more than a shared cultural background?

There's a book you might like called Mein Kampf.

[Miste]

The very definition of ****-posting.

???????????????

What???

1. You posted a generalization (which was unnecessary).

2. I replied saying you shouldn't generalize billions of people like that because it is rude and ignorant.

3. You reply again and say there are studies that prove your generalization to be true.

4. I reply and say, no, the studies you linked are not proof and you would have known that if you had read my reply properly and bothered to read the articles you yourself linked.

Nothing is wrong with this back and forth. If you are afraid of people responding to you then you probably shouldn't post? Just because someone disagrees with you doesn't mean they are bleep posting.

Neither of you needed to add to the thread, but you did anyway, knowing that I'm going to ignore your hostile language posts anyway.

You didn't need to post that massive generalization about billions of people either, but you did. None of this would have even happened if you had taken your own advice.

I never used any hostile language so I don't know what you are talking about.

Respect is earned, not given. People you think I'm being rude to, were already rude to me or others in the past.

Are you trying to say that the billions of people in the western hemisphere were all rude to you so that is why you are rude to them by making generalizations about them? <.<

Because...um...yeah I'm at a loss here about what made you come to this conclusion.