Quote Originally Posted by Fyce View Post
So, again, analogies aren't meant to be over-analyzed to be debunked. They just try to convey a simple idea. That's their sole and only purpose. As long as this idea is relevant to the point, it's good enough.
...honestly all of that that you're critising here, sounds a bit like what you did with the expression "new content" and tryint to establish wether or not people were using that phrase correctly when they had different interpretations while completly ignoring the actual points of those, who dont like Eureka and why they dont like it, were making...

I dont mean to attack you but if you're advocating for not over-analysing analogies, maybe we can agree on not over-analysing single words and expressions aswell and rather focus on the actual points being made?