What's your first impression of Eureka?

[Alleo]

Oh sorry, am I posting in "Show your hate against Eureka and disrespect anyone who is not doing the same"?
I didn't realize, my bad.

People have posted that they liked it in this thread just fine, without people going for their opinion. I honestly dont care if you like it or not. But I have the right to voice my opinion about this too yet how often were we told that we should try it more and more which kinda hints that some posters cant understand that you simply find this content boring. Some people on the side of those that likes it have gone out of their way to personal insult us and you yourself are arguing about semantics a lot. So yes both sides can be bad.

Some posts:

You assumed that what people complained about are "core issues" which need to be solved. This has yet to be determined, both in terms of accuracy and scale. You also assumed that the complains were coming from "the vast majority". You said that there was a "severe lack of communication" even when SE said and proved that they were listening to feedback.
The community has a pretty big history of screwing things up because a vocal minority blowed things out of proportions. For one person complaining about Eureka, there are dozens who actually play it and are fine with it. What you are basically asking is that SE completly ignore these players and focus blindly on the ones who agree with your views.

Give them some time to analyze everything and get back to us is my point. If you want them to rush it, it'll be crap.
But I guess asking people to be reasonable is too much.

You call us a vocal minority that blows things out off proportions and take our opinions down because for you most ingame enjoy it and we are just the part that screws it up. And you end the sentence that its too much to ask for people to be reasonable.

Here's the full quote, since you seem too lazy to check the converstion yourself:[...]

Please read this thread instead of just commenting on the tip of the iceberg without having the full context.


You are right, I don't know these either. Which is exactly why I didn't make any argument using based on that. And that was my main point: I don't make baseless assumption to criticize something. I do with the information I know I have, and I don't extrapolate simply because hating every aspect of Eureka is the new trend.

You said to someone that they are lazy because they read your post differently. Also you go and say that you dont make baseless assumption and call hating every aspect of Eureka a trend. This is attacking our opinions and you are stating that if someone just simply hates it they are following a trend and not because its their own opinion that they got on facts.

Confrontation and peer validation is what they seek. Your beliefs and opinions are of no importance to them. They will not recognize that you may like of believe in something they don't.

[...]
The only way to win with these people is simply by not trying to argue with them. I learned it the hard way.

People who cannot agree to disagree shouldn't be given attention.

Again you go around with the "they". Not some or anything. Also you are also not just simply agreeing to disagree.

Normaly I dont do this but you had more than a few passive aggressive posts. None of these posts needed those attacks. You could have simply showed the person your sentence again instead of calling them lazy. You go around and argue semantics. Why not agree to disagree?