Results -9 to 0 of 233

Dev. Posts

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player
    Sairys's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    184
    Character
    Senu'a Retkha
    World
    Ravana
    Main Class
    Red Mage Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Aniise View Post
    Nah, I think your approach on this might be a bit too agressive, not to be rude. Or maybe it's better to say that it seems that you look only at the facts while I try to take emotional factors into account.
    I mean, the issue with the emotional factors you're taking into account is that they only those of the people that have been benefitting from the current system, and in turn you're arguing that they should continue to benefit.

    The other side is that for every person that talks about the joy they've had decorating their second or third house (or their practically private ward), there is a group of people upset about the housing situation. People that want to experience that who are locked out.

    There are FCs that want to get a house to get the benefits they convey for an FC, but that group of people is being told that they need to suck it up because someone really needs to have a cute library for their scholar alt while their warrior needs a trophy den. Because the one player would feel sad if they lost their two houses?
    But somehow that one person is more important than the group of people that are frustrated/upset/angry?

    Realistically, forcing people down to 1/1 is simple utilitarianism if you want to get ethical. It's the greatest good for the greatest number of people, it might suck for some, but it's going to be good for more people.
    (6)
    Last edited by Sairys; 01-19-2018 at 10:59 PM.