Page 5 of 24 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 15 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 231
  1. #41
    Player
    MuseTraveller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    586
    Character
    Mihn Saruihn
    World
    Malboro
    Main Class
    Bard Lv 80
    I got two personal smalls back when housing wasn't an issue on my server. I furnished them with lots of love and I hope one of them will find a nice loving owner in 4.2!
    There is an emotional attachment, yes but it is a fix to the system that I welcome!
    (9)

  2. #42
    Player
    Maoska's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    46
    Character
    Vivi Ku'ro
    World
    Zodiark
    Main Class
    Astrologian Lv 90
    Q: Can you relocate if you already own several free company estates?
    A: Relocating and purchasing are processed differently, so you are able to relocate.
    I think this probably is a answer to the most important question.
    (2)

  3. #43
    Player
    Almagnus1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Ul'Dah
    Posts
    941
    Character
    Maley Oakensage
    World
    Behemoth
    Main Class
    White Mage Lv 100
    IMO it would probably be a good idea to get rid of the excess houses while you can still control which house you keep, because you know SE will retroactively enforce the housing limit on all accounts eventually. I mean, look what they do with currencies.

    4.2 effectively starts the beginning of the grace period because you know they'll force the issue down the line.
    (4)

  4. #44
    Player
    RayneLittlewinkle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    429
    Character
    Tesni Eiddwen
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Scholar Lv 90
    So when housing goes live. People won't be able to purchase a home if they are wanting it for private use? Does anyone know if it will be for ALL plots or maybe only the large?Which a large I can understand, I feel those are made for FC'S On a server like Balmung.. restricting it to FC's only is kind of shitty how in the world is that giving everyone a "fair" chance. -.- Maybe i'm reading it wrong though. I haven't had my coffee yet
    (1)

  5. #45
    Player
    Sairys's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    184
    Character
    Senu'a Retkha
    World
    Ravana
    Main Class
    Red Mage Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Aniise View Post
    Imagine that scholar who dreams of his 'own cute library' and really wants it, prepared for it and gathered all the money by himself, but gets outrun by that FC that prepared aswell. In that case that scholar need to suck it up just as well.
    You wouldn't want to tell the FC that they have to give up their house for the benefit of the scholar, right? Then, why do it the other way around? Because the scholar already has another house, or an appartement, or a room in his FC's house? They both had the same chance of getting a house in this case. The other party was just a tad more lucky. Who are we to say who deserves it more?
    The scholar in the example already has one house... so yeah, they should suck it up if an FC without a house beats them and the Scholar doesn't get it... too bad. Similarly, no... I wouldn't expect an FC with only one house to give it to a Scholar who already has one.

    Simple maths really makes it balance out quite obviously, if there are more unique players in the fc than 1 then they are more important than the 1. Just to point it out... the devs have said who deserves it more with the way they've tilted everything in favour of the FCs now... it's the FCs.



    Quote Originally Posted by Aniise View Post
    Sadly that's what housing is in FFXIV. To change this, the _whole_ system would need a complete change that would probably result in taking all houses away, and install instanced housing or something like that, and I guarantee you that there would be a big uproar if they suddenly decided to do this.
    Yeah, seems like they could avoid that by... not grandfathering people in and buying more time to add more wards in.

    Quote Originally Posted by Aniise View Post
    Long story short, I just can't stand behind the idea of taking things from people they have owned for a while just 'for the greater good of the majority'. In my eyes it's plainly wrong, while in your eyes it might just be the best choice they can make at this point. I guess we just stand on different moral points there.
    It's not really morals it's ethics. But realistically, applying your stance against yourself, it's morally right to take the houses away because the emotions of those that don't have houses would be negatively impacted.
    (4)

  6. #46
    Player
    Sairys's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    184
    Character
    Senu'a Retkha
    World
    Ravana
    Main Class
    Red Mage Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Almagnus1 View Post
    IMO it would probably be a good idea to get rid of the excess houses while you can still control which house you keep, because you know SE will retroactively enforce the housing limit on all accounts eventually. I mean, look what they do with currencies.

    4.2 effectively starts the beginning of the grace period because you know they'll force the issue down the line.
    Realistically yeah, right now people can probably shift their favourite house onto their main with help but glhf if they try when the resell timer goes in.

    Quote Originally Posted by RayneLittlewinkle View Post
    So when housing goes live. People won't be able to purchase a home if they are wanting it for private use? Does anyone know if it will be for ALL plots or maybe only the large?Which a large I can understand, I feel those are made for FC'S On a server like Balmung.. restricting it to FC's only is kind of shitty how in the world is that giving everyone a "fair" chance. -.- Maybe i'm reading it wrong though. I haven't had my coffee yet
    Afaik, you've read it right. The whole thing is set up to prioritise FCs cause not having a house prevents them from accessing stuff such as the submarines coming in this patch.
    (1)

  7. #47
    Player
    Aniise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Crystarium
    Posts
    381
    Character
    Nhaama Kagon
    World
    Shiva
    Main Class
    Scholar Lv 95
    Quote Originally Posted by Sairys View Post
    Simple maths really makes it balance out quite obviously, if there are more unique players in the fc than 1 then they are more important than the 1. Just to point it out... the devs have said who deserves it more with the way they've tilted everything in favour of the FCs now... it's the FCs.
    Wow, so the dev's have 'said' who is more important now huh? I don't think the rule changes should be interpreted exactly this way.
    Yes, they give the FCs an advantage now which is surely a good and welcomed change, and I also wrote that a few pages ago if I recall correctly.
    But I guess it's happening because of the uproar after the Shirogane launch. Not because they think Fc's are more important. This is just your personal interpretation.
    And if people should give up their houses now only for the benefit of FCs or rather small FCs with less then 4 people...well... quoting myself:

    Quote Originally Posted by Aniise View Post
    Edit: Also, with the new system added, it's almost guaranteed that each FC who wants a house will get one. Even the ones with less then 4 people; all they have to do is recruit a few players beforehand which isn't that much work tbh.
    If an Fc doesn't use that big advantage then the fault lies with them. Simple. People who've had two houses for like 4 years shouldn't be punished for it now. :/
    We can turn in circles speaking about ethics and stuff while from your point of view it's morally right, and from my point of view it's morally wrong. I guess we won't change each others point of view no matter what.
    (2)
    Last edited by Aniise; 01-20-2018 at 12:20 AM.

  8. #48
    Player
    Tsunenori's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    251
    Character
    Shima Kyaro
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    White Mage Lv 100
    Definitely a big fan of the restrictions, but I'd be a bigger fan if I knew they were thinking hard about how to address the personal housing conundrum on the back of this. I've felt for a while that neighborhoods should belong to FCs and Apartments should be massively expanded to accommodate players, and I'd happily relinquish my personal house of a few years in favor of a system that granted some permanence like that without the currently-existing and strict limitations of the apartment system. Still, even a temporary restriction is a positive step. My FC's had their house for a few years as well, so for me this is all about not wanting to see ghost town wards bought by players who don't log in and never decorate while FCs are left in the dark due to login roulette.
    (3)

  9. #49
    Player
    Rymm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    901
    Character
    Rymmrael Bhaldraelwyn
    World
    Lamia
    Main Class
    Paladin Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Aniise View Post
    People who've had two houses for like 4 years shouldn't be punished for it now.
    I would just like to point out that the word "punished" isn't correct here. Being impacted negatively by something does not necessarily make it a punishment. I agree that players who purchased multiple homes did not break any rules (I'll not go into whether or not it was morally/ethically wrong) that SE had in place for housing, largely because SE totally screwed up housing and there were loopholes all over the place.

    It's like owning a home with a big, beautiful front lawn for years. Eventually the traffic in front of your house gets worse and worse and finally the city has to do something to relieve the gridlock. So they decide to add another lane, by widening the street and taking part of your front lawn to do it, maybe even chopping down a tree or two. Does it negatively impact the homeowner? Yes. Is the homeowner being punished? No. But the city needs to infringe on their luxury in order to make the lives of the majority of people better.
    (8)

    ~ My FF14 IG account ~
    https://www.instagram.com/rymmrael/
    ~ Interesting FF14 fan creations to check out ~
    https://aetherflowmedia.com
    http://www.eorzeasntm.org/

  10. #50
    Player
    Penthea's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    3,664
    Character
    Nettle Creidne
    World
    Moogle
    Main Class
    Scholar Lv 100
    Look I get it that it sucks some people might lose some of their houses but you can't deny that SE obviously do not encourage players to have houses on their alts. The game is literally designed so that you can do everything on one character. Having an alt grants little to no advantage to mains. SE do not encourage the playing of alts, you can even have a subscription that pays for just one character per server.

    Just because you are able to do something doesn't mean it was intended by the devs. Housing in this game is riddled with poor planning and the massive oversight of letting alts also have as many houses as a main is one of them. It's about time SE address this.

    I sincerely hope they do not grandfather anyone, because this would mean more players would have access to housing. This would mean more happier players. It would also make more sense and be more fair on the player population as a whole if we all are subjected to identical restrictions.
    (7)

Page 5 of 24 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 15 ... LastLast