I mean we can be pedantic about it to how each gimmick works and how in that sense, none are comparable. But the point from it is not the specifics, but what you clarify in the end. MNK is still the job with the biggest circus to achieve nominal results on par with its peers.
They are, but false assesment are detrimental to anyone's argument. You want to be percieved as trustfull ? Don't say X job can do Y while it's wrong or inaccurate.