WAR raid "UTILITY" (Tank Balanced achieved?)

[Chrono_Rising]

Really? Darkest Night isn't raid utility because "people aren't depending on a 5k shield". Then wtf is every paladin move?

Snip

Can we at least stop the blatant hypocrisy? A 5k shield available every 15 sec that can be used on anyone, or a 10k shield on yourself ISNT the vaunted raid utility?

Sure, lets stop the hypocrisy. If mitigating myself is raid utility then I don't understand why shaking off a debuff wouldn't be considered utility. It might be used once every other tier only on Sundays between 6:00 and 6:01 pm if it is a full moon, but by this logic hey its there so its utility. So I assume you point hinges on the 5k shield on another member. Ok, so the 5k on another person, is it a useful utility, or is it more like clemency is a utility? Its there, but should it actually be used? The answer is no not really. As for this:

Blackest knight is absolutely raid utility. "Its the mitigation they need". Yes all those OT darks are really using it for mitigation. Please.

Drk is in a bit of a rough spot atm, but lets not go delusional.

Well lets look at top dark knight parses, how often are they using their shield on their MT as an OT. Almost 0. Is it because the "utility" is a dps loss in dps stance outside buff windows? Yes, it is or at least the numbers are so close to being a loss or a break even that its usually better spent on dark arts to increase dps.

Where as for paladin we have a raid shield which mitigates 10% of hp and is not a dps loss for the paladin to put up. You also have PoA but yes this comes at a dps loss, but it mitigates damage for everyone.

Finally this:

If war got that exact same ability Drks would be crying themselves to sleep rocking back and forth saying "War is the darkest night!"

You have this already, its called inner beast, and a oGCD free heal called equilibrium, it is a dps loss but hey it’s there right? It isn't every 15 seconds, but the WAR mitigation kit is really well designed and doesn't really need a every 15 second mitigation. This is my point, sure technically TBN is utility, but my point in replying to the post is that it isn’t nearly as great as it is made out to be and most of the time is personal mitigation. Much like warrior won’t want to use inner beast or equilibrium in heal form, most dark knights in a raid won’t want to use tbn for anything other than self mitigation, and even then they will try to minimize its use outside of grit.

[Claire_Pendragon]

If mitigating myself is raid utility then I don't understand why shaking off a debuff wouldn't be considered utility.

It technically IS utility. As it can be something to help u skip mechanics etc. (if it were done right, which is the main issue, it ended up not really being done correctly)
But its also not the "utility" that most people mean when they say "Utility". Which is the next issue. People usually mean utility in a different way, which is a bit vague, and has a lot of exceptions.

Well lets look at top dark knight parses, how often are they using their shield on their MT as an OT. Almost 0. Is it because the "utility" is a dps loss in dps stance outside buff windows? Yes, it is or at least the numbers are so close to being a loss or a break even that its usually better spent on dark arts to increase dps.

It's a DPS loss, because, from the creators perspective, if it werent, ppl would be trying to keep TBN on CD as much as possible, so as to keep spamming BS, and if so, that would effect its usefulness if its on CD when a tank buster is going off. (Similar to how plunge might be on CD, as a DRK wants to use it for DPS< but then gets knocked back, unable to stop themselves from falling off an edge.)
(But yeah, MP holds a greater value than Blood in most cases, with exceptions. Thats one of the reasons why you want to use delirium with Blood Weapon, instead of BS

Where as for paladin we have a raid shield which mitigates 10% of damage and is not a dps loss for the paladin to put up. You also have PoA but yes this comes at a dps loss, but it mitigates damage for everyone.

Bolded the part about hitting everyone, as thats the key bonus for PLD.

You have this already, its called inner beast, and a oGCD free heal called equilibrium. It isn't every 15 seconds, but the WAR mitigation kit is really well designed and doesn't really need a every 15 second mitigation.

IB being a GCD, and more of a DPS loss than TBN, since TBN tries to almost refund the DPS with blood. Plus the real issue is that IB doesnt target a party member.
But dont get me wrong, I agree with the usefulness of IB as well. Its amazing. I would consider a WAR for a MT over DRK, in HW, solely for inner beast, oGCD stance dancing, storms eye/path, and holmgang. As those abilities can make ur life as a healer far easier, and give some slashing dmg in case u didnt have a NIN (now SAM too)

Personally rethinking some things, I think TBN needs to becomes at least 15% mitigation for allies, to (1) make sure its actually making a difference, (2) make it harder to break the shield, (3) and to then make it fair for a DPS increase to keep TBN on CD. DRK almost has enough CDs for tank busters w/o it, so honestly a DRK can simply learn to just not use it for 15s, if they know a TB is about to pop in less time.
If BS actually becomes worth while, or TBN grants more blood, or even the MP of a syphon strike, that also would put it into a DPS increase. This would raise the skill level of DRK too.
It would be seen as a major raid utility job, but it would still be good enough.

[Aana]

Snip

The hypocrisy is whining that TBN 'isn't raid utility' because a shield 'doesn't help people much' while in the same breath whining about other tanks having shields for other people being to much raid utility.

You don't get it both ways. Shielding party members either is, or is not raid utility. If it is, then drk has some, and then move along to discussing the power and nuances of those abilities and the entire kit of the job itself. If it isn't, then you cant call party mitigation of any kind raid utility because they do the same thing. Reducing damage taken or giving shields are functionally the same use. If the fact that its single target means as, you put it, 'is for the MT and therefore not utility' then neither is cover or intervention.

Directly protecting other members of your party with mitigation for very low or zero costs cant be a worthless party trick on drk but absurdly OP because its on war or pld. Pick one.

[Claire_Pendragon]

snip

Im confused who you're addressing with this. You quoted my post, when I was in agreement with it being utility, but then are saying something someone else said, as if the statements were directly related to eachother.

[Aana]

Im confused who you're addressing with this. You quoted my post, when I was in agreement with it being utility, but then are saying something someone else said, as if the statements were directly related to eachother.

Edited for clarity. Was responding to Chrono both complaining about other jobs raid utility while simultaneously dismissing Drk's wholesale. You are correct though on your points. Would only add that looking at 'top drks' as a model for using tbn is a poor comparison. The 99% people are having the entire raid work towards feeding that person so they can get a top number. Personal balance cards, working party mechanics around that individuals uptime. Of course they aren't going to use a (slight) dps loss utility when they are going for personal dps records with the party on board for that goal.

Look down the list a bit at the 'good' runs where healers and MT aren't bending over backwards to cater to 1 persons record numbers. The highest combined tank and healer DPS runs do use TBN because its a mitigation buff at a miniscule cost which frees up more healer DPS and tank CD conservation for the group as a whole.

[Chrono_Rising]

The hypocrisy is whining that TBN 'isn't raid utility' because a shield 'doesn't help people much' while in the same breath whining about other tanks having shields for other people being to much raid utility.

You don't get it both ways. Shielding party members either is, or is not raid utility. If it is, then drk has some, and then move along to discussing the power and nuances of those abilities and the entire kit of the job itself. If it isn't, then you cant call party mitigation of any kind raid utility because they do the same thing. Reducing damage taken or giving shields are functionally the same use. If the fact that its single target means as, you put it, 'is for the MT and therefore not utility' then neither is cover or intervention.

Directly protecting other members of your party with mitigation for very low or zero costs cant be a worthless party trick on drk but absurdly OP because its on war or pld. Pick one.

If you cannot see the difference in being able to shield an entire party vs. shielding one person during aoe I'm not certain what to tell you. In my reply I was very clear about the domains that I was speaking about.

Using TBN on a dps because of raid damage isn't helpful because during raid wide damage healers need to heal everyone to full, 5K on one person is not helpful. To be clear, raid wide shields in this example are very helpful.

Using a Shield on your MT is not high enough mitigation to be meaningful as there are better ways to mitigate.

The only time TBN is helpful is if someone takes damage they shouldn't have, but it only buys them 5k hp.

Therefore I conclude TBN is not really meant as a utility and is more about personal mitigation as 11k health starts being the difference between living and dying at times when things don't go to plan.

My issue is with the scope of the shielding offered by paladin (and potentially warrior) as compared to what dark can give. Both shields are worthless for single targets and will likely never be used for such because both are very weak. The only exception is when you are shielding yourself on dark knight at which point it is not utility but mitigation.

[MyaValentine]

snip

so you are saying TBN should be a raid shield? is already good as it's giving a 15s party wide buffed intervention seems a bit too overpowered not even passage is that strong why take an scholar anymore when you can have a drk lol. I do agree that maybe drk needs some raid wide uility but I don't think raid wide TBN is the answer that's just too much, Drk just needs to do more damage have more abilities and mitigation. I think TBN is awesome as it's but the priority should focus on its dps and mitigation not his raid utility people are giving it more credit than it should

[Chrono_Rising]

so you are saying TBN should be a raid shield? is already good as it's giving a 15s party wide buffed intervention seems a bit too overpowered not even passage is that strong why take an scholar anymore when you can have a drk lol. I do agree that maybe drk needs some raid wide uility but I don't think raid wide TBN is the answer that's just too much, Drk just needs to do more damage have more abilities and mitigation. I think TBN is awesome as it's but the priority should focus on its dps and mitigation not his raid utility people are giving it more credit than it should

Never said this. TBN raid wide is way too strong imo, but dark is significantly lacking in party utility. Again I am responding to the person who said TBN is a great utility, it isn't a great utility. It is great personal mitigation.

[Aana]

If you cannot see the difference in being able to shield an entire party vs. shielding one person during aoe I'm not certain what to tell you. In my reply I was very clear about the domains that I was speaking about. My issue is with the scope of the shielding offered by paladin (and potentially warrior) as compared to what dark can give. Both shields are worthless for single targets and will likely never be used for such because both are very weak. The only exception is when you are shielding yourself on dark knight at which point it is not utility but mitigation.

I read fine. The only reason you don't like TBN is because its a 'dps loss' and cite the top drk parses to support that claim of uselessness. As I said, check the top PARTIES. Overall high DPS groups, not the drk that got 20 balance cards fed to him and the only goal was individual max DPS.

I looked at FFLOGs and found the highest rated GROUP that had a drk on the list. (the 1st with a drk was in another language and couldn't read it. So I used the 2nd highest raid group rating that had a drk). Looked at neo exdeath. The very 1st high performing group I found had a 99th % Drk performance in Neo Exdeath in used TBN 11 times. Didn't have to go digging to find some oddball case. 1st thing I could find. TBN used constantly in top tier raiding. Must be because its SOOO bad. Good day sir.

[Chrono_Rising]

I read fine. The only reason you don't like TBN is because its a 'dps loss' and cite the top drk parses to support that claim of uselessness. As I said, check the top PARTIES. Overall high DPS groups, not the drk that got 20 balance cards fed to him and the only goal was individual max DPS.

I looked at FFLOGs and found the highest rated GROUP that had a drk on the list. (the 1st with a drk was in another language and couldn't read it. So I used the 2nd highest raid group rating that had a drk). Looked at neo exdeath. The very 1st high performing group I found had a 99th % Drk performance in Neo Exdeath in used TBN 11 times. Good day sir.

I never claimed anything about your reading. And the parse you mention did this to their OT as you claimed? I'm looking at the second highest they use TBN 5 times and on themselves. Also not looking at personal parses, I'm talking about speed runners who maximize party dps.

...
Blackest knight is absolutely raid utility. "Its the mitigation they need". Yes all those OT darks are really using it for mitigation. Please.
...

Also you mischaracterize most people who run things for high percentiles as being balance fed.

... The 99% people are having the entire raid work towards feeding that person so they can get a top number. Personal balance cards, working party mechanics around that individuals uptime. Of course they aren't going to use a (slight) dps loss utility when they are going for personal dps records with the party on board for that goal.

...

This is simply personal number fluffing. This does happen, and I do agree that they should not be modeled after. However, most people who run for high percentiles know the real way to hit hard is to raise everyone to the ceiling. Its why when you look at 99th percentiles you tend to see them with other 99th percentiles.