Dragoon pet

[Efrye]

Pets are generally supposed to be interactable in PVP. Making them immortal seems stupid, especially in PVP parties where you can just turtle up and let the pet kill everything in sight while the party heals each other and the pet. [...]

They could simply bind a wyverns attack to the dragoon's attacks. Dragoon doesn't attack, wyvern doesn't attack. If only everything would be so simple as implementing a pet...

Edit: Oh, and before the topic of kiting comes up again: Obviously wyvern should not be able to draw hate. In the version I described, it would be nothing more than a visual element (there I go again). It shows up as mesh flying next to you and as a number in the log, but it doesn't have any real impact.

[...] You are just too wrapped up in the idea of having a dragon/wyvern as a pet for the class.

/shrug, it's much more simple than that: I like dragon pets, you don't.

Note to self: I need to find a synonym for "simple" as well, if I keep posting here.

[SilvertearRen]

They could simply bind a wyverns attack to the dragoon's attacks. Dragoon doesn't attack, wyvern doesn't attack. If only everything would be so simple as implementing a pet...

Edit: Oh, and before the topic of kiting comes up again: Obviously wyvern should not be able to draw hate. In the version I described, it would be nothing more than a visual element (there I go again). It shows up as mesh flying next to you and as a number in the log, but it doesn't have any real impact.



/shrug, it's much more simple than that: I like dragon pets, you don't.

Note to self: I need to find a synonym for "simple" as well, if I keep posting here.

If you want dragon pets, wait for the gosh-darn drake mount.