Healers that don't want to DPS are like DPSes who refuse to move out of AoEs.

[BigRed5392]

I claim that i know what I do because you started to say that it's lazyness while... it's not.
I've been patient to explain why and how healing and dpsing works and you're saying this.

What do you want me to say now?
Seems like I can't argue because for you, a dpsing healer is someone that doesn't know his job or is lazy.
That's what I feel like.

I'm healing on this game since a long of time, I've done ton of content (dungeons, extreme, savage). I'm not claiming "i'm pro-player", but "I know my class after all this time and thing always are fine when I heal, even if I dps".

I don't know what is your main classes, but if you aren't a healer, how can you tell that i'm doing my job badly then ? =/

I've been playing ff14 since 2.3, my g/f has been playing ff14 since 1.0. If you are not keeping your tank at least 90% hp. that is bad, dps when you have nothing to do. Don't dps if your tank is sitting to 50% or less hp.
There is a huge difference between, dpsing because nothing to do (no one requires healing) or just not healing to dps letting ppl sit on low hp, just to cast a big cure.

It also takes away the main role of the dps, who's job IS to deal damage. My opinion is: I see "forceful" dps healers as people who don't trust their dps party members, so they take it upon themselves to dps. They forgo their main role to dps, and leave tank to sit at 50% or less hp.

This is imo putting dps first healing second. It should be healing first dps second. Keep your tank @ 90% hp. Dps after. This is how my g/f played healer, and none of her runs told her off.

Also labeling off what content you do, is meaningless as it doesn't prove a thing. And you are also assuming my stance. Idm if a healers does damage, my g/f doesn't mind healer doing damage. Just not when she/ or the tank is at or under 50% hp.

putting healing secondary to damage is the wrong way to play healer imo.