Quote Originally Posted by Kaedan View Post
Yes, that's exactly what it means... when the paraphrase/summary does not accurately reflect what was said.

You are aware that there are thousands and millions of reposts of information on the internet that are worthless because they summarize the content inaccurately, aren't you? Especially when it comes to translations.

As the poster above me says, a first hand source is always more credible than a second hand source. You have a first hand source stating what YP actually says. If anything else from a second hand source contradicts that source, then the second hand source is wrong. Period.
And yet just because it's typed in the form of a quote must mean it's 100% correct as well? Despite there being numerous outlets, reactions, and commentary contrasting the one singular entry that contradicts it? That's not to say it's not impossible for the majority to be wrong of course, but when you're clinging to one article as if it's infallible on top of not even having seen the panel it came from yourself is a bit ridiculous.

You don't get to hand wave any article not conforming to your idea as being second hand information. You have zero evidence what's first hand and what's second hand, they're all reporting the same event, many of which during the live-stream as it happened, it doesn't get more first hand then that.