Results -9 to 0 of 673

Threaded View

  1. #10
    Player
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ul'Dah
    Posts
    678
    Quote Originally Posted by darkstarpoet1 View Post
    oh i was not promoting taking away of them at all. i was more of just using his point against him. he wants the subjob system but not the whole thing. he wants it so they can concentrate on 2 classes and not enjoy all of them. if he wants to do that he does have that option, but he wants to take the option away from others to have 3-4 classes because he is only going to use 2. the thing is using traditional as an argument goes against the traditional values. if you are a gla you should be a gla only not a gla/monk as each would take a lifetime to perfect.
    I just came back to say that this makes absolutely no sense. Seriously, look at my sig (which is outdated)... do I look like someone who is only going to play 2 classes? I'm someone who leveled 5-6 jobs to 75 when I played XI so this notion that I'm only doing this to be lazy... I don't even know where to begin.

    I'm sorry but your "point" is... let's just say you should've thought that out better. Cause it doesn't refute mine nor have much to do with it.

    The problem with your system is you are trying to make the sandbox small then we already have access too.
    Of course I am and I admit it. Not because I want to but because we have to. This mix-match, play what you like regardless of how good/bad it is, is whats killing the game. Current classes have no sense of self because in the end we're only leveling them to a certain point to get X skill/trait. As I said in the OP, find me 5-10 Lancers that you know personally who leveled it to 50, then I'll tell you 20-30 that leveled it just for Fleet of Foot (20).

    Lastly, I'd just like to apologize for looking at these changes through the eyes of a min-maxer.
    (0)
    Last edited by Kurokikaze; 03-18-2011 at 04:29 AM.

Tags for this Thread