Results 1 to 10 of 2057

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player

    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Eos
    Posts
    251
    No, parsers are for elitist players.

    if you want elitism go back to WoW.
    (3)

  2. #2
    Player
    Orbiaus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    161
    Character
    Ririnzo Roronzo
    World
    Odin
    Main Class
    Monk Lv 70
    Quote Originally Posted by Inori-Yuzuriha View Post
    No, parsers are for elitist players.

    if you want elitism go back to WoW.
    I'm not elitist though and didn't come from WoW. I just want to do better damage in the game and improve how I play. Seeing the numbers gives good feedback. PC users i've known have improved lots due to a parser.
    (7)

  3. #3
    Player
    Shirai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    880
    Character
    Shirai N'yankoro
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Fisher Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by Inori-Yuzuriha View Post
    No, parsers are for elitist players.

    if you want elitism go back to WoW.
    Parsing itself has nothing to do with elitism, I consider myself a very casual player but I am passionate about playing my jobs properly.
    My reason for wanting a parser, like the majority of parsing players, is not to rub my results into other's faces or tell them how bad they are, but to measure myself with players that have comparable stats.
    I just want to know if I'm doing a good job, and that doesn't end at "We won and didn't die".
    (5)
    Last edited by Shirai; 11-11-2016 at 09:12 PM.
    Felis catus

  4. #4
    Player
    Xiao_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    107
    Character
    Xiao Tianfeng
    World
    Siren
    Main Class
    Bard Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by Inori-Yuzuriha View Post
    No, parsers are for elitist players.

    if you want elitism go back to WoW.
    this is the worst meme. posting your parses to fflogs and circlejerking over them is for elitists, parsing in general is not
    (2)