Would you like an in-game parser?

[Dualgunner]

That wasn't the point but lol ok.

You felt it relevant enough a point to post, I felt it relevant enough to comment on. Nice backpedal though, very middle school tier.

[LyraKuroneko]

You felt it relevant enough a point to post, I felt it relevant enough to comment on. Nice backpedal though, very middle school tier.

What do you want me to say? Trying to be mean won't make me argue with you more you know. It wasn't what i tried to point out that's all.
I talked about learning a fight, nothing more.

[Dualgunner]

What do you want me to say? Trying to be mean won't make me argue with you more you know. It wasn't what i tried to point out that's all.
I talked about learning a fight, nothing more.

You brought up a stale, archaic point about how learning a fight in an older game in the franchise didn't need a parser. It didn't need a tank or a healthbar either. I only "tried to be mean" when instead of defending your point you dodged it entirely and pretended your post had nothing to do with that point you brought up.

Taika makes good points about it being singleplayer so the only time being spent was your own.

[LyraKuroneko]

You brought up a stale, archaic point about how learning a fight in an older game in the franchise didn't need a parser. It didn't need a tank or a healthbar either. I only "tried to be mean" when instead of defending your point you dodged it entirely and pretended your post had nothing to do with that point you brought up.

Taika makes good points about it being singleplayer so the only time being spent was your own.

Yes, and I was answering someone talking about those older games, meaning i was wrong to even answer?

In any "hard" fight, you need to train, singleplayer or not. The rest sure is different, but this part stay true.

[Dualgunner]

Yes, and I was answering someone talking about those older games, meaning i was wrong to even answer?

In any "hard" fight, you need to train, singleplayer or not. The rest sure is different, but this part stay true.

They brought up purchaser intent. You brought up gameplay design. I can see the idea behind your response now, but you didn't properly address their point then.

[Dualgunner]

Just because people can misuse a tool doesn't mean the public should be denied that tool. With that logic, the public should be denied the internet because not everyone uses it correctly.

[Dualgunner]

Beside the internet (and that is not intirly true), a lot of things are indeed forbidden because of the use that can be done of them. That aside, if SE do add a parser, i want a way to report cancerous parser user like we can for RMT, sorry.

Can I have a way to report cancerous anti parsers as well? Given recent history that might be more used. And no, it is entirely true that not everbody uses the internet correctly. Or at least, not in a healthy and supportive way.

Name me one tool humanity has evet conceived that cannot be misused.

[LyraKuroneko]

Can I have a way to report cancerous anti parsers as well? Given recent history that might be more used. And no, it is entirely true that not everbody uses the internet correctly. Or at least, not in a healthy and supportive way.

Name me one tool humanity has evet conceived that cannot be misused.

Why asking? you know as much as i do there's none. And sure, both behavior are not correct, having a simple to report harsh behavior would be better and shouldn't be limited to parse related.

[Dualgunner]

Why asking? you know as much as i do there's none. And sure, both behavior are not correct, having a simple to report harsh behavior would be better and shouldn't be limited to parse related.

You do know harassment is already reportable right? Introducing a parser wouldn't change that to the point where parse harassment wouldn't need its own specification.

Hence my request, which was more highlighting the silliness of both requests.