Would you like an in-game parser?

[Ghishlain]

thanks for the update, just wanted to do a minor correction on the last one:

those stats aren't group parser vs. personal parser, those are stats for personal parser vs. parser in general. To get the proper stat you would need to do do 180-116 as people can vote multiple times.

so group vs. personal would be
Total - 180 votes
Group - 64 votes (35.55%)
Personal - 116 votes (64.45%)

I believe what you're trying to say is that "Parser" is a bit different from "Group Parser" which I can understand so let me know if that's what you think as your comment initially confused me and I had to read it a few times to make sure I understood.

My interpretation of that option is that he's asking for a "group" parser (AKA full fledged DPS measuring tool without any limitations) but wouldn't mind some clarity either from the OP because I can see your interpretation in that.

[Lambdafish]

snip

I interpretted the OPs posts (both in my calculation and voting) as:

"Yes, I would like an in game parser." - in general, in any form
"Yes, but I would only like a personal in game parser." - specifically personal parser.

My assumption is that anyone who voted for wanting a parser, but did not vote for personal parser only wants a group parser. This would also mean that your stat breakdown for "no vs. yes (group parser)" is now a "no vs. yes" in general.

[Ghishlain]

I interpretted the OPs posts (both in my calculation and voting) as:

"Yes, I would like an in game parser." - in general, in any form
"Yes, but I would only like a personal in game parser." - specifically personal parser.

My assumption is that anyone who voted for wanting a parser, but did not vote for personal parser only wants a group parser. This would also mean that your stat breakdown for "no vs. yes (group parser)" is now a "no vs. yes" in general.

That's understandable and I can see where you're coming from. As I mentioned earlier my interpretation was "Yes, I would like a parser that is unrestricted (aka, group parser)" since I feel when people talking about a parser in general, they mean one without limitations or restrictions.

I can see both ways so it would be nice to get some clarity since you know what they say about assumptions. lol.