Quote Originally Posted by Ghishlain View Post
All these questions can be answered with hard math[...]
Thanks for agreeing. Because that is the entire point I made. Not all rotations necessarily come from parsers and not even all "good" rotations necessarily come from parsers.

Quote Originally Posted by Kazumac View Post
You don't make an educated theory and call it fact without measuring it, if possible.
The problem is: For the theory to be wrong, you must either have miscalculated (human error) or the potencies in the tooltips have to be wrong (game error). If the potencies in the tooltip can be wrong, so can the numbers in the battle log and thus the parsing result. Thus, assuming no human error, the "proof" is just as likely to be wrong as the theory itself. No biggie if both fit together, but sucks when there's a mismatch because you can only check for human error in the calculations and parsing algorithm.