Save the Armory system

[Galka75]

I think the fact of lock the jobs to only one class is a bad move... I know i know... We must wait and see, but just like someone say in this threat: there will be only one change of change battle system. So understand the worry about a critical change on a loved game.

I read we ppl like a gladiator whit sword and a thf whit daggers... Well, talk for yourself. I don't find any reason why a tank class can nit use a great axe or meaby a lance to perform his job to protect his allies. Of curse i dont want to see, and it will no have sence to see a tank whit a ranged weapon. But this is a really easy issue to solve.

Just by locking a job to certain types of weapon. PLEAS NOT LOCK TO ONLY ONE CLASS-WEAPON.

In example. A paladin will be able only to use close rank weapons. A hunter will be able o ly to use ranged weapons. A mage job will only can use magical ranged weapons.


In the other hand i read some is really interesting. More job class-specifict than only one. So Gladiator can unlock PLD, Beserker and thf. So all class will be able to especializate their own to 3diferents playsatyles. Tanks, DD, and supports. But i find this more difficult and conflictive than just allowing use jobs whit any class whit certain limitations just like the mentioned before.

[Konachibi]

I think the fact of lock the jobs to only one class is a bad move... I know i know... We must wait and see, but just like someone say in this threat: there will be only one change of change battle system. So understand the worry about a critical change on a loved game.

I read we ppl like a gladiator whit sword and a thf whit daggers... Well, talk for yourself. I don't find any reason why a tank class can nit use a great axe or meaby a lance to perform his job to protect his allies. Of curse i dont want to see, and it will no have sence to see a tank whit a ranged weapon. But this is a really easy issue to solve.

Just by locking a job to certain types of weapon. PLEAS NOT LOCK TO ONLY ONE CLASS-WEAPON.

In example. A paladin will be able only to use close rank weapons. A hunter will be able o ly to use ranged weapons. A mage job will only can use magical ranged weapons.


In the other hand i read some is really interesting. More job class-specifict than only one. So Gladiator can unlock PLD, Beserker and thf. So all class will be able to especializate their own to 3diferents playsatyles. Tanks, DD, and supports. But i find this more difficult and conflictive than just allowing use jobs whit any class whit certain limitations just like the mentioned before.

A good post, and don't think I'm picking this apart by what I'm about to say...

Usually, in a logical sense and over the course of history, a person/soldier/warrior/knight who dedicates himself to the protection and preservation of others uses a shield so as to deflect, parry and block incoming blows, therefore reducing/stopping any damage possibly received. It would for instance, be extremely difficult to stop a bullet or an arrow with a lance, where as holding a shield up provides adequate protection from ranged weaponry as well as close-range weaponry such as swords, daggers and such.

That's just a logical stand-point on it though and I'd have no beef with anyone who wanted to tank with a two-handed weapon, or even dual-wielding swords, instead of a 1-handed + shield. If they can do it, then there's no problem.