Quote Originally Posted by Adire View Post
It apparently is confirmation bias. Because I just provided you with proof that disagreeing with me does not provoke me to make accusations of not reading. Posting in a manner that shows reading was not done sufficiently does however.

One example of many:

Someone said this



When I had already said this only one page earlier:




You really seem inclined to believe that I am accusing everyone who disagrees with me of not reading. I am only accusing people of not reading when it's clear they've posted without reading. I've already given you proof of that being incorrect, here is another piece of proof. Let's see if you believe me now.
I'm sorely tempted to make a joke about not reading, but I'm not claiming it's a 100% thing, but a pattern. I even said that rules have their exceptions, and that I thought it was a pattern, not an absolute 100% occurrence.