Quote Originally Posted by Kosmos992k View Post
I know what it is. I know what it does. If you know what it does, then how can you poosibly argue that a technique that *reduces* the resolution of an image can in any way increase the fidelity of the resulting reduced image? What you are suggesting is like saying that an MP3 ripped at 320kbps sounds better than the raw audio on a CD.
Because its hard to argue with results , the results are clear, more detail shows on the screen with comparisons. Seriously, instead of complaining actually do it your self and see the results. Also audio is an interesting one since I own a $130 usb DAC + audio technicas m50 which are around $130 if I had to look at USA prices .