Stoneskin II

[RaquelleAvarosa]

I'm calling SE out on their mishandling of this. What's wrong with that? Or should we just allow SE to implement things in a half assed manner and let it slide because "oh there's more important things to worry about." WHMs fought hard to have this QoL change and were rightly rewarded for their efforts. Why can't SCHs do the same? Because somehow us having the same thing is less worth it?

mis-handling? oh drama mama

SS2 is not SS1, SS2 is a WHM skill and SCHs are not WHMs oh god, just stop.

I don't know about your data center but in mine, tanks NEVER buff the party. Some probably have even forgotten that they have protect and SS cross classed. I've always buffed the party on my own because that's part of my job.

That made me facepalm because clearly you have no idea how SCHs heal. And I'm not saying that SSII isn't an extension of SS. Do you agree though that it's also a pretty useless extension of SS in battle? It's ONLY purpose is to speed up the buffing process out of battle which SCHs do partake in too.

I've just ran a DR with a tank and buffed the party, there, just disproved you.

want to speed up SS buff? get a WHM.

you know whats wrong with this thread? its that you're making it sound like SS is such an fundamental and essential component of SCHs that if SCHs do not buff SS, they're gotta get kicked from the party and they will never ever find a party because a SCH doesn't buff SS and since you're so fixated on the SS AoE buff, please, play a WHM.

Let's just be honest, you wanted the skill because of a perceived convenience, it is not essential to your job and SCHs are not gonna fade into disuse because they don't SS and parties are not gonna call a SCH out for not SS-ing, it is your own choice whether to SS in the unfortunate event that there are no WHM which I find highly unlikely in end game primals and raids.