We really NEED another GREED

[ReiszRie]

I agree with the OP in one regard.

If someone rolls Greed on something for a class that they haven't even unlocked, then no, I don't think they have any rights to the loot. If they actually wanted the loot for the class they would have made the attempt to AT LEAST go to the Guild and unlock it. If there's a blank hyphen sitting in the class's level place, then no, they should not be able to roll greed for it at all. I can for sure recount a time or two when this has happened.



A Coil Turn 1 for example when it still had weekly lockout does. SMN has Ifrit out, we're at Snake, pet aggroes, starts fight early, then that SMN dies. And before he gets raised, he returns to the beginning, then gets locked out. Once the fight is over no help to him whatsoever, he rolls greed on some Monk gear and gets it over other people who actually had a much more deserving chance of it. Did he have the class even unlocked? Nope, Pugilist was blank. I actually said something at the time as well, we should not have let him had a shot at anything at that point, and I would have blacklisted him myself.

Because he did not apologize, say he was sorry, nothing. He died, let us do all the work, then said nothing, got some gear for no work practically, then left after saying "gg". Those are the kinds of people something like this would help to avoid.

So a player with all classes at 50 would benefit from this system regardless of whether he/she needs or even wants the gear to begin with.

In fact it doesn't seem to solve anything at all, if you had a PT with players that are all 50, the same could've happened and the player who got the loot, might even simply discard the loot.

Ultimately, the issue lies with the players, not the system and I am against any sort of system that gives a player a loot advantage simply because they leveled em all to 50