Please adjust Directional requirements for DRG to match how it is for MNK

[Mardel]

Great idea, once TT-VP-FT also require positions to do full potency as well.

Funny attempt at trying to make it sound "fair" but you must consider you won't get to do those IF you mess up the Heavy thrust and chaos thrust combo.

I wish they'd give us the buff from PvP that we can use to ignore the positional requirements.

[Allyrion]

Funny attempt at trying to make it sound "fair" but you must consider you won't get to do those IF you mess up the Heavy thrust and chaos thrust combo.

I do consider that. I'm just saying that the "optional" positions come with the design that all monk combo abilities have positional requirements.
So you want the less punishing system, you should have to dance like monks too.

Decent trade right?
Currently.
MNK pro - Positionals are only potency bonuses rather than requirements.
MNK con - All combo moves have this bonus.

DRG pro - Only 2 positionals
DRG con - Much more punishing if positional is missed.

The DRG system feels fairly clunky, I'd admit. But if you want the same positionals as the MNK, then add them to all your moves as well since that's the balance.

[Mardel]

I do consider that. I'm just saying that the "optional" positions come with the design that all monk combo abilities have positional requirements.
So you want the less punishing system, you should have to dance like monks too.

Decent trade right?
Currently.
MNK pro - Positionals are only potency bonuses rather than requirements.
MNK con - All combo moves have this bonus.

DRG pro - Only 2 positionals
DRG con - Much more punishing if positional is missed.

The DRG system feels fairly clunky, I'd admit. But if you want the same positionals as the MNK, then add them to all your moves as well since that's the balance.

I agree on that point, though I think drg should have been more side oriented.

[Gooner_iBluAirJGR]

I do consider that. I'm just saying that the "optional" positions come with the design that all monk combo abilities have positional requirements.
So you want the less punishing system, you should have to dance like monks too.

Decent trade right?
Currently.
MNK pro - Positionals are only potency bonuses rather than requirements.
MNK con - All combo moves have this bonus.

DRG pro - Only 2 positionals
DRG con - Much more punishing if positional is missed.

This guy is right. Stop crying and play monk if you don't like the way dragoon works. If they make the changes the OP is suggesting then Monk = Dragoon and the game is over.

[SeraviEdalborez]

This guy is right. Stop crying and play monk if you don't like the way dragoon works. If they make the changes the OP is suggesting then Monk = Dragoon and the game is over.

I'm not sure what you mean by this if you think they aren't already more or less equal. Or why it would be the end of the world if they were.

[Kiteless]

I do consider that. I'm just saying that the "optional" positions come with the design that all monk combo abilities have positional requirements.
So you want the less punishing system, you should have to dance like monks too.

Decent trade right?
Currently.
MNK pro - Positionals are only potency bonuses rather than requirements.
MNK con - All combo moves have this bonus.

DRG pro - Only 2 positionals
DRG con - Much more punishing if positional is missed.

The DRG system feels fairly clunky, I'd admit. But if you want the same positionals as the MNK, then add them to all your moves as well since that's the balance.

Or they could stop making fights that automatically shut down specific classes.

[Sylari]

Funny attempt at trying to make it sound "fair"

Well that is the concept, Dragoons have fewer moves with positional requirements but are more heavily punished for failing to be in the correct position. Monks have tons of postional requirements but lose less on each individual miss.