Results -9 to 0 of 214

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player
    Kevee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    700
    Character
    Virtual On
    World
    Leviathan
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by OmegaNovaios View Post
    I'm glad we have Blizzard II over Thunder. It will boost our AOE burst on 2+ mobs and improve our AOE DPS on 5+ mobs. IMO that's better than keeping the same setup but equivalent in DMG loss to gaining a more useful tool to cover our weaknesses at the same time.
    Blizzard II is barely an increase over Tri-Disaster. It's 20 potency more/cast.

    It's not something to be happy gaining over Thunder, at all, especially because there is no real functional use of AoEing 5+ mobs besides 2 phases in T4. Everywhere else, Thunder was superior. Both for AoE, and ST, and it rewarded skillfull play.

    Why do you think there's a lot of people in these topics that have popped up saying SMN is bad? Both people who play SMN, and bystanders.

    It's because there's an exceptional few who knew what they were doing, and they knew how strong they were. Did you know standing in melee and auto attacking will give you ~5-7 more DPS? I always stand in melee, always.

    How many other summoners can you say do that?
    (1)
    Last edited by Kevee; 12-17-2013 at 12:22 AM.