Quote Originally Posted by Abriael View Post
Unfortunately for this absolutely silly statement, the fact that an argument isn't valid for you doesn't make it less valid.

Plenty valid, compelling and intelligent arguments have been made against jumping. You not liking them has no bearing at all on their validity.



See, fact is that your book is completely inconsequential. The dev's book is what matters, and quite evidently, given the drop in priority of the implementation of jumping, the very clear possibility that it will never be implemented, and the fact that they're instead tweaking environmental collision detection (as many that are against jumping suggested) as a much more convenient feature, it's people for jumping 0, people against jump 1.

Sorry to burst a bubble. Oh wait... I'm not really THAT sorry, mind you.
You talk a lot yet i don't see any of those fabled valid arguments, and there i was getting excited i would see one in that wall of text.

The dev put it as a low priority simply because if you have to chose between jumping and the battle system/jobs etc it's quite clear which deserves more attention at the moment.

So I'm still waiting to see those arguments that are supposedly "there" and that will make me say "hmm... yeah that kind of makes sense."