Quote Originally Posted by Shougun View Post
No. Common sense would be that you understand the possibility that SE would revive a boss (like they have done in every FF game). And that it is supported by allusions to a particularly famous reviving boss - and even further supported by similar nuances of that boss and this one as well as subtle precedence set by primals.

Relics are 100% for sure going to be in 2.0 obtainable not sure how you related those.

I dont think anyone says for 100% sure he will be there, but it is not 100% sure he will not be there. (Until rep/dev response at least).
Yeah, they do revive the bosses. I fully expect to see Nael make a come-back in some fashion, but think to yourself. Why would they give out the very item that is the ONLY incentive for the current version fight. It doesn't make any sense.

Also in regards to the seal comment. Back before Relics were "About" to be introduced when Hamlet was released. The primal seals were found, and Rowena specifically mentioned that they would be used to obtain something. and yet, we had dozens of threads speculating they weren't for the quest.

I'm not posting this to be an ass. To me this is a common sense thing. To award the reward for the ultimate boss to someone in ARR who chose to not do it when it was available as a one time thing is a slap in the face to anyone who did it.