How is this NOT harrasment/griefing?

[rina_inverse]

I'm going to agree with OP on this. I think that if the OP is in a party with people and he's trying to do behest for experience - GOD FORBID THAT PEOPLE ENJOY THEIR LEVELING - the 50 should be the one to either a) leave the behest alone until these people leave or b) go to another camp altogether. There's absolutely no reason one 50 should have the entire reign of a public event just because he wants his pretty little number to grow; people should be more courteous and step down when they see other people in need of something.

Can you do it?

[Yucie]

Can you do it?

Seems my post went over your head.

I have three 50s; WHM/CNJ, GLA/PLD, and LNC/DRG. On top of that, I already explicitly stated I don't give a rat's ass about achievements. Xbox Live, however, is a different story. But I digress. Also, I don't do behest or the lower caravans.

Could I do it, if I really wanted to? Certainly. But that's not the point.

The real question is: Would I do it? Would I do things like that to work toward an achievement if it meant possibly ruining another player's experience (and a lower player to top it off)?

No, I would not. Ever.

Hope that answers your question.

[rina_inverse]

Seems my post went over your head.

I have three 50s; WHM/CNJ, GLA/PLD, and LNC/DRG. On top of that, I already explicitly stated I don't give a rat's ass about achievements. Xbox Live, however, is a different story. But I digress. Also, I don't do behest or the lower caravans.

Could I do it, if I really wanted to? Certainly. But that's not the point.

The real question is: Would I do it? Would I do things like that to work toward an achievement if it meant possibly ruining another player's experience (and a lower player to top it off)?

No, I would not. Ever.

Hope that answers your question.

Its allright if you can/could/would/should do it