fflogs and privacy

[Phyoka]

Sure, but the way logs are recorded right now absolutely outs the person who recorded the encounter. The first person to load in the instance is the person running ACT.

Using that information, among other bits of data, you can easily determine on a mass scale which user recorded the log. It's no different than a video or image showing mods active on a user's account.

Using a website that shows performance ranking? Sure that's okay! But recording people's gameplay performance without their knowledge or consent, then posting that to another website? That's def actionable.

[Lilapop]

Sure, but the way logs are recorded right now absolutely outs the person who recorded the encounter. The first person to load in the instance is the person running ACT.

Using that information, among other bits of data, you can easily determine on a mass scale which user recorded the log. It's no different than a video or image showing mods active on a user's account.

Using a website that shows performance ranking? Sure that's okay! But recording people's gameplay performance without their knowledge or consent, then posting that to another website? That's def actionable.

But if people didn't record other people's gameplay performance without telling them how would they then proceed to use it against them in earnest later?! Think!!! /s

[Phyoka]

But if people didn't record other people's gameplay performance without telling them how would they then proceed to use it against them in earnest later?! Think!!! /s

I don't know what's worse...

The fact that YOU thought you needed the /s

Or the fact that I think the /s is necessary

[Lilapop]

I don't know what's worse...

The fact that YOU thought you needed the /s

Or the fact that I think the /s is necessary

Tried it without the /s on a previous post, users of fflogs of course were offended and assumed I meant everyone who ever even thought about the thing had the sole intent of harassing people, decided to play the safe route this time!