Chaotic Alliance Raid: More Content for Professional Gamers

[AllenThyl]

Is your source "trust me bro"? why should your percentage be believed over Hastatus's?

Please. Use your favorite search engine, you will find all possible sources pretty quick. They aren't perfect, but none of them are even in the ballpark of "1%". And have never been historically either, when one couldn't hide their lodestone profile. If you are in an expert dungeon, inspect your teammates for savage gear. It will def be more people than 1 in every 30 who will have savage gear equipped.

[Lilapop]

Please. Use your favorite search engine, you will find all possible sources pretty quick. They aren't perfect, but none of them are even in the ballpark of "1%". And have never been historically either, when one couldn't hide their lodestone profile. If you are in an expert dungeon, inspect your teammates for savage gear. It will def be more people than 1 in every 30 who will have savage gear equipped.

"wheres ur proof?"
"google it bro"

The original post you replied to said it'll make "1% of players happy." Nothing relating to gear or expert dungeons. Which, with the amount of criticism surrounding this fight, I'm inclined to actually believe as it stands right now, 1% is closer to the amount of people who are actually happy with this fight as is right now. For everyone one person saying the fight is fine and doesn't need to be changed, there's a whole thread of people disagreeing. To answer your comment directly, there are no sources that measure... happiness? Am I missing something? Is there a misunderstanding here?

[AllenThyl]

"wheres ur proof?"
"google it bro"

The original post you replied to said it'll make "1% of players happy." Nothing relating to gear or expert dungeons. Which, with the amount of criticism surrounding this fight, I'm inclined to actually believe as it stands right now, 1% is closer to the amount of people who are actually happy with this fight as is right now. For everyone one person saying the fight is fine and doesn't need to be changed, there's a whole thread of people disagreeing. To answer your comment directly, there are no sources that measure... happiness? Am I missing something? Is there a misunderstanding here?

Yeah, in this case, it is indeed "google it bro", since none of these sources are in any way official and that gets me into the gray area of getting banned on these forums pretty quick. Further, if your argument is that my statement is not acceptable because I don't have official sources to quote, then the argument of "1%" should be completely unacceptable for you, because there are zero sources for that number. There is a difference between a rough estimate based on the available data, and just making up stuff to just slag on a quite significant part of the community.