I really want to know which type of feedback they ignored?So in light of the newest announcement over the graphic update's unintended minor changes on some character faces, it seems that yes, the dev team does read the forums for feedback, because this has been specifically addressed again and again and once more today. The explanations even go into great detail about the whole process and the results of the investigation they have been running, even though they conveniently not mention any species/races.
One specific point also caught my eye:
Meanwhile, job design feedback has been consistently ignored or scorned for years, and when something gets changed (like VPR, but that's just an example among many), we get told that they considered feedback that lead to such changes, while this feedback definitely does NOT come from those forums. So, I ask the dev team again, where does job feedback come from, so that I can give my feedback where it actually matters?
Secondly, why does feedback for the graphic update garner such detailed threads covering them while battle content feedback never gets anything addressed in such a manner?
is it job busy or job do not need changes.
it is very vague
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.