And yet all of his solutions to each test in the Rite of Succession were met with a prevailing sense of 'Okay, that'll work and you can proceed, but we much prefer Wuk Lamat's solutions of not innovating at all and working with what we already have'. The Hanu Hanu chief among them. They are given an innovative solution for their reed-growing issue that could presumably work in any and all circumstances and yet they are enamoured by Wuk Lamat's genius idea of dancing in front of the flowers and hoping that'll do the trick.
His only real mention in his hometown of Shaaloani is that of skepticism towards the future of industrialisation, and there was potential for a notable subplot using Heritage Found as a possible endgame of innovation and the mutation of culture that isn't explored in favour of giving Wuk Lamat yet more screen time to ramble about smiley faces.
The 'most correct' solutions in the RoS were always the ones that didn't innovate on traditions at all. Pelu Pelu started rooting for Wuk Lamat because she showed a savviness in their trade culture; Hanu Hanu preferred her idea of repairing the float; her biological father wink-wink nudge-nudged her into making the correct traditional dish and also understanding the culture behind it. Koana effectively gave up and endorsed Wuk Lamat on the basis that she better understood the people of Tural despite the fact that he not only wasn't disqualified but also kept her in the running by saving her life.
We go to Solution Nine where they have mixed culture with innovation and spend time talking about how unnatural Regulators are and how they shouldn't be using them. The raid tier is leading directly towards providing an excuse to abandon regulators altogether because Wuk Lamat is never wrong and we can't annex them properly while such an 'icky' cultural difference exists between the two.
But yeah, a few people walking up to Koana when he walked out in the crowd is enough of a foundation to sell me on the moral of the story being at all cohesive with how they got there.


Reply With Quote




