Quote Originally Posted by ASkellington View Post
I said no to both of you. Its was easier to not multi-quote you both so I didn't, so I'm not targeting you specifically, just using your post because you mentioned how it would be similar but different.

Second, what am I supposed to concluded by your sentence? You specificed nothing. You didn't add for another attack, you didn't even clarify whether or not AST continues to have Combust. You said to put emphasis on other's which could mean either through the standard buffs we have now or by changing them to do indirect damage based on one idea I saw earlier but cannot confirm who made the suggestion, neither of which I'd want.

But sure, if you don't want me to comment at all I won't.
Right, but you’re suggesting that I needed to have had several more actions listed out to justify not thinking Astro needs a DOT, which is what I was saying about not being allowed to comment on anything unless you’ve already designed a fully functional alternative healer design. Because otherwise you get people jumping to conclusions like how my idea apparently will only make Astrologian worst to play in solo content despite having only written literally a sentence talking about specifically DOTs. How do you know that what I’d do to Astro if I were the designer would make it worse in solo when you know almost nothing about any other ideas I might have? Because like you just said, you don’t even know if combust still exists in my interpretation of what Astro should look like.

Imagine handling other conversations like this.

“Hey, do you want to watch a movie?”

“Absolutely not. That movie sounds terrible and nothing like what I’d want to watch.”

“I didn’t even tell you what movie it was…”

“Exactly. You gave me no name, no genre, I don’t even know how long it is. So naturally it must be horrible.”