I didnt know 35000 was bigger than 95000, well you learn every day I guessThe total playerbase, not just Steam players?
Okay, got a link/statistic to prove that?
That ALL players dropped 50%, not just Steam players? (And as I recall from that discussion you had before, I actually used the statistics to prove you wrong, showing that the number of players at the same point in a given expansion shows EW growing, not shrinking, compared to ShB, using the Steam numbers:
Okay, just so we're clear:
100 players but only lost 10 = Not bad, only lost 10%
100k players, lost 65k = the world is ending
![]()
I would give you as advice to read the definition of a sample
https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sample
Have we been here before? I think we have. Did I dream it? Man...Deja Vu up in here.
When you deal with human beings, never count on logic or consistency.
Fluid like water. Smooth like silk. Pepperoni like pizza.
Partly this.
Steam players are also generally more diverse than just the MMO or JRPG markets. That is, different likes and different preferences We also have no evidence that steam players do not behave differently than the playerbase as a whole, but we DO know that the majority of the playerbase doesn't use Steam. Which means the Steam numbers likely aren't predictive. Further:
This is what bad statistics takes look like, and explains why you're wrong so much.
You're comparing to 23k, not to 95k. That's your problem and what you don't understand.
EVERY MMO, without exception, has an inflation of players when expansions release that then declines into their steady state amount. Endwalker's steady state is ~30% higher than ShB's was using the Steam numbers. That would indicate growth, not decline.
Where you'd use the 95k number to compare to, if you're going to do so, would be the month Dawntrail releases.
You know this, because I explained it to you before. This is where that whole "if you read my posts instead of snarking off about them" thing comes in. I wouldn't have to make the point to you over and over and over again, with you being wrong over and over and over again while feigning "I don't understand why people would say..." over and over and over again if you'd just read and listen the first time.
Last edited by Renathras; 09-04-2023 at 09:32 AM.
this does not refute what i said. it just says what a sample is. picking and choosing something and saying over and over again you are completely right doesnt make your use of the information wrong.I would give you as advice to read the definition of a sample
https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sample
I aint picking nothing, I am showing statistics my friend, sorry you disagree with them, not my problem though.
Nope, you didn't dream it. We had this exact same conversation before.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sampling_biasI would give you as advice to read the definition of a sample
https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sample
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selection_bias
EDIT:
You say this because you don't know what sampling bias is.
Or, rather, you know what it is and why it's an issue here, you just likely don't want to admit it.
Last edited by Renathras; 09-04-2023 at 09:34 AM. Reason: Marked with EDIT
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.