I feel like I'm not playing the same game as a lot of you with the way people talk about Dissipation in this hyperbolic way. Respectfully, even in speed kills of P8S right now, you HAVE to cast GCD heals. If you can't see the value in Dissipation in that alone, I don't know what to say. The 20% GCD boost to Dissipation is very helpful, and the full stack of Aetherflow is great too. There's a LOT of healing that is done in P2, and if speed kills are still needing to cast Succor and Adlo, can you not see how useful it is? Dissipation is an invaluable prog tool. We can make all the arguments for "SCH only has 3 GCD heals, it shouldn't be using them at all!" but that's simply not the case when content still requires SCH to use those heals.
People always talk about how "optimally" Dissipation is used. "It's only used on the Aetherflow! And that's only 300 potency every 3 minutes! It's simply not good and it locks you out of your HEELS!" As if the people making these arguments are playing the job at the organized optimal level where this is all you use Dissipation or Aetherflow for. (Even top healers use Aetherflow on heals as well, so)
Could Dissipation be buffed? Sure, I wouldn't mind. Make the 20% healing potency buff SCH's oGCDs too, I don't care. That would make it even more useful for Lustrates for pumping into people who get Natural Alignment or for spot healing during High Concept potentially. But skills having inherent tradeoffs isn't a bad thing. If you've exhausted your fairy heals or the 20% potency + full stack is more useful, use Dissipation. If not, use your other heals. Dissipation is a multifunctional tool just like Recitation, and people need to treat it like that. Why do we seriously have people arguing that the ability to have another on demand full stack of Aetherflow is somehow "hot trash" that could be removed with nothing lost? It absolutely would be a loss to Scholar, no matter what.

Reply With Quote



