Ardbert's Party vs the Scions Analysis

[Lauront]

So what I'm gathering from these recent posts from you, Theodric and Senti is that your new group strategy is to focus on the semantics of the word "demand", as if that somehow is relevant. We can change the word "demand" to "urge", and nothing would change. The point remains that you, Aveyond, Theodric, Rulakir and the rest of the clique continue to peddle the argument that certain things in the story (burgers, humor, the Scions in general, etc.) are objectively bad and that it is imperative that SE listen to your criticisms in order to save the game for the silent masses that agree with you, or else the game will decline in quality or even die. I suppose that, in the attempt try and make this look less forceful than it is, you wish to avoid the negative connotations of calling it a "demand".

"Group strategy" is a very interesting spin on it, as is the word "clique", when it is simply my own take on that particular point. But while we're on the topic: forceful in what sense and why is it significant?

I don't recall ever claiming it is imperative for SE to listen to anything I have to say or that it converts to some "silent majority" viewpoint - SE can do whatever it wants and I can likewise do whatever I want, all the way up to unsubbing/not buying future products of theirs. Obviously I am offering the feedback in the hopes that they will listen to me, as do we all.