Sundering stuff established in the Q&A

[EaraGrace]

We can wash our hands of it when it has quite literally nothing to do with the convo at large. The conversation is could Elidibus mediate said conflict, not could he mediate it 12,000 years after the fact. For all intents and purposes there's very little that suggests he could not at the time of pre-sundering. Of course though, whether Venat was actually open to reason remains to be seen. I'd suggest not as she chose to keep it all a secret.

Ah the immediate shift to “Venat must be the problem,” which totally absolves all other actors of their own failures. When members of Venats group were waved off and ignored exactly what was Elidibus doing to “mediate?” When the decision to make the third sacrifice came down even without the rift in Amaurot resolved what was he doing? And don’t even start with the secret stuff, we’ve had that conversation in the past and you refused to see the reasons for why that was necessary.

As for Lahabrea, i honestly would have thought especially after Fourche people would stop being so quick to judge but this forum continues to amaze me in regards to this. People handle grief in different ways, as we have seen time and time again in this game. We also see again, how he seems to care for Elidibus' well-being, and this is after Elpis. I dont think it reflects inherently badly on him, otherwise i think most parents in 14 would be considered horrible lol. People seem to forget all the cutscenes and short stories we have giving us some insight on Lahabrea.

Cant wait for the scene where Lahabrea gets in his knees and begs for Erichthonios forgiveness, if we’re following the Fourchenault arc. Totally something someone would do when they did the right thing. And I don’t believe “handling grief” requires abandoning your child, defending that with the “he’s going through a hard time” defense is just wrong.