I disagree with this assessment only because the job really hasn't altered the AI in a significant manner throughout its lifetime, just how we interface with it. Because of this it is not only reasonable, but expected that when we encounter any significant period of downtime with new Summoner we are left vulnerable to a situation where you have two back to back ghosting instances, specifically Summon Egi Avatar into Devotion into Summon Bahamut/Phoenix. It's a big reason I want at least Bahamut to remain as an oGCD so you can space it out with a lateweave. Even if the avatars had to remain a GCD in that situation you could space it out with Avatar -> Ruin IV (early weave Devotion) -> Ruin II (Lateweave Bahamut) at worst. It could be worse than that but SE doesn't let you use back to back Avatars unless you have zero Attunement stacks. Whether it's even worth spending your last stack on each phase remains to be seen, but the likely scenario this is a problem in only needs about...12 seconds of downtime? It's really small and clunky.
Functionally back to back Avatars and new Devotion is the exact same ghosting issue we have with current Devotion on Carbuncle, apart from the lack of auto-attacks -maybe- making it more responsive. I'm not expecting that to actually work as intended. I am expecting to need to early-weave it to account for GCD Bahamut as the current opener late-weaves both to intentionally avoid this problem. I can say that because that's how little SE is willing to change things regarding pets. Demi-Egi took three expansions to get Egi Auto attacks added to their rotation. If the Avatars were at least oGCD I think they would be way better, though that comes at a potency cost most people really don't want to accept. I think the flexibility and downtime gains outweigh it enough to matter.



Reply With Quote

