Results 1 to 10 of 641

Dev. Posts

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    dezzmont's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    171
    Character
    Gaen Zaer
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Culinarian Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by KizuyaKatogami View Post
    I’m assuming instead of Endwalker you mean ShB. Irregardless of that though, i don’t think it really has to do with the theme. Look at the 2b coffer for crying out loud lmao. But even SB had a lack of male themed glams. Instead we got things like the Shisui glams. And the bunny outfit which wasn’t even changed to better suit men, it was just the exact same version as the female one. It just seems like there’s a lot of laziness involved with the male glams where they hardly alter outfits, for example healer and caster gear, where they obviously design them with females in mind. And then barely change it at all for male characters. It’s just a reoccurring thing.
    You are right, I meant SHB, whoops!

    Shisui is ONE dungeon glam set that was themed well for them and which added variety to the dungeon sets of Stormblood, which you can find here.

    Of these, I would say the bonewicca set is fairly 'transgressing' in intent, the Royal Volunteers set is what one might consider... 'more traditionally masculine than normal unisex clothing' with its super chunky combat armor even on casters, and the Shisui set which are... not feminine per-say. I get why you might not want to go out and wear them personally, but I would more say they are for someone seeking a 'certain type of glam.'

    So the 'look at stormblood' thing falls flat. ONE dungeon has a glamset that is for people looking to be... flashy lets say, regardless of gender. I very much understand if it is not uhh... 'for you' unless its on a female character, do understand that isn't the case for everyone and XIV strives to be a game where EVERYONE can look like they walked out a Victoria's Secret catalogue if they wish. Gender Equal eye candy being relegated to one optional dungeon which makes sense for the culture of the world seems good with me.

    The 2B situation and the bunny set situation are different. The FFXIV team have been getting non-stop requests for the male bunny outfit as is, so they didn't change it and it actually was hard for them to get the office to do it WITHOUT changing it, to the point they had to get female employees to do it. Which I think doesn't reflect great on the guys in the team considering how willing they were to do the girls in it, but that is sorta what the community overall wants: The ability to have glamours for everybody, rather than to gender segregate glamours. This is also why the 2B outfit and the raid sets were the way they were: the community made it fairly clear they don't like the fact that there are these ultra revealing skimpy outfits that hyper-sexualize the female characters and not vice versa, and that so many outfits were gender locked. I do get there is a frustration with how many very explicitly girly girly 'premium' outfits there are, but this was a very special situation in both cases.

    As for the healer and caster gear being minimally altered... that is because most are... robes? Which are gender neutral? Unless you mean the YoRHa set being minimally altered, in which case, your I would disagree and point out its one of the most altered outfits in the game. "Kinda femme" doesn't not mean "Clearly meant for a woman."

    Don't get me wrong, I 100% get not clicking with a lot of sets this expansion, it happens and in fact I bounced of quite a few of them. But saying 'they are for women' is very silly when so many of them are clearly unisex and merely don't mesh with your personal style. If you can't rock the Neo-Ishgardian caster top into making you look like an awesome steampunk gentleman adventurer, well that is more on you than SE. A lot of these 'frilly' parts are amazing because they are so different and open up glam options in combination with other stuff. That is, again, why we want glam diversity, rather than getting constant repeats of 'Full plate and full body robes' and you might be very shocked at how rugged you could look in an outfit by mixing in some heavily armored boots and gloves to get a 'battle caster' vibe.

    Not every set is meant for every person and maximizing variation in sets naturally means there are a large quantity of sets you will never wear. For example, I will almost never wear 'full, masculine armor' on Hrothgar because it kinda makes em look... not even fat, but boxlike, which I don't like and it means every 'full plate' outfit is DOA for me. Certainly SOME should come out, but I am glad its usually 1-3 a set (save fending sets, which still make sure to get non-armor sets out there each expansion) rather than 'all we get as male characters' and even if I never intend to wear the chest-piece often an element from them can come in handy.
    (2)
    Last edited by dezzmont; 07-30-2021 at 03:03 PM.

Tags for this Thread