Open World PvP

[linayar]

And? It is their choice 100% whether they have friends there or not.

Uh, no, lol, it's their friends' choice.

Also, frankly, if someone doesn't want to PvP and they join a PvP server just to take up PvPer's housing? ..

When there is shortage, it's a bad idea to segregate availability by locking some inside PvP server.

[SturmChurro]

Uh, no, lol, it's their friends' choice.

When there is shortage, it's a bad idea to segregate availability by locking some inside PvP server.

There are quite a few games my friends enjoy, that I don't enjoy. You know what I do? I don't play with them. It's okay! Those games aren't for me, just like PvP might not be for some players!

They aren't "locked" on a PvP server, there are DOZENS of other worlds players can join, plus there would be house openings with the players transferring to the PvP world, not to mention Oceania being added. For that matter, it's very rude if there would be players who have no interest in a potential PvP world's premise, join that world and complain about "forced PvP", and on top of that take up actual PvPer's housing. That's just my opinion though.

[linayar]

There are quite a few games my friends enjoy, that I don't enjoy. You know what I do? I don't play with them. It's okay! Those games aren't for me, just like PvP might not be for some players!

They aren't "locked" on a PvP server, there are DOZENS of other worlds players can join, plus there would be house openings with the players transferring to the PvP world, not to mention Oceania being added. For that matter, it's very rude if there would be players who have no interest in a potential PvP world's premise, join that world and complain about "forced PvP", and on top of that take up actual PvPer's housing. That's just my opinion though.

Nevertheless, it becomes a consideration for some and it's unnecessary when there is no need to make a PvP server when adding servers is a huge deal for SE. It's a wasted effort when every new server could serve everyone.

If you want to PvP on a PvP server, play a game that has it. Even WoW doesn't have PvP servers any more.

[linayar]

You are not "segregating availability" The pvp server gets the same number of houses any other server gets. They don't have any bonus nothing is locked in there and no one is locking anything. You are free to join it or not.

I know many people dislike to hear this but not everyone is meant to have a house. That's why there isn't infinite houses and that's why houses open first to FCs and that's why there are apartments there is no "shortage" there is meant to be the exact number of houses there is. The idea that "Everyone is supposed to own a house" is made up. but this is completely different argument.

So the pvp world should not have housing? Because Why? Any other server has one. Let's shut down the whole world because they have housing and I can't have piece of it and my server's housing is full.
There number of players vary across DCs does that mean you are ""segregating availability" by adding housing to other DCs but you can't play on it because your ping is high?

PvP server should not have housing? That's not what I'm saying. There should be no PvP server when a new server could benefit everyone, not just those who want to PvP.

[SturmChurro]

PvP server should not have housing? That's not what I'm saying. There should be no PvP server when a new server could benefit everyone, not just those who want to PvP.

How exactly would having a PvP world be a problem? Not even one?