Results 1 to 10 of 716

Thread: Open World PvP

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player KizuyaKatogami's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Posts
    3,472
    Character
    Kizuya Katogami
    World
    Cerberus
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 81
    Quote Originally Posted by Valkyrie_Lenneth View Post
    Every mmo thats released since XIV has been said "it'll kill xiv" BDO, Arch Age (hah, remember that one?!)

    Also, I remember watching lazy peons video. He didn't provide criticism so much as he crapped on the game.

    From my experience most people who are upset about asmongold coming over are former WoW players, as they are the ones who know who he is. I'd never heard of him until recently

    also, I find it funny you accuse others of being unable to take criticism, while being unable t do so about ashes yourself. Plus, theres a LOT of PvP "gatekeeping" in this thread.
    Yes, when criticism is applicable. Not when the game is still in early testing stages. Criticism should also be done only when theres been ample research done for whatever you are critiquing. Yes, LazyPeon's video was poorly done. If you look at my other posts where i've mentioned him, i agree it was bias against 14. That said however...

    Quote Originally Posted by Kes13a View Post
    Might help if context was provided as to why their "review" may have set a few people off.

    but sure, doing what they did wouldnt have offended any vocal player base in any mmo....ever....
    It doesnt matter the context. Death threats and doxxing isnt good period. It doesnt matter what the person did,because as weve seen in the Scottzone sitatuon, someone can give the tiniest piece of criticism and still be doxxed and get death threats from this community. These are only the two big people its happened to. There've been smaller ones as well.
    (3)

  2. #2
    Player
    Valkyrie_Lenneth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    8,037
    Character
    Lynne Asteria
    World
    Jenova
    Main Class
    Viper Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by KizuyaKatogami View Post
    Yes, when criticism is applicable. Not when the game is still in early testing stages. Criticism should also be done only when theres been ample research done for whatever you are critiquing. Yes, LazyPeon's video was poorly done. If you look at my other posts where i've mentioned him, i agree it was bias against 14. That said however...



    It doesnt matter the context. Death threats and doxxing isnt good period. It doesnt matter what the person did,because as weve seen in the Scottzone sitatuon, someone can give the tiniest piece of criticism and still be doxxed and get death threats from this community. These are only the two big people its happened to. There've been smaller ones as well.
    Criticism is valid whenever a game is in a playable state for testing. I played the "pre-alpha" for Ashes at Pax Prime like.... 2 or 3 years ago. It should be beyond "no criticism stage" by now. The game is outside of the significant design change stage of its development. Just like XIV was during 1.0s alpha and beta. Those criticisms to 1.0 during those stages were definitely valid.

    In fact, its the best time to provide criticism, in case there is even the slightest chance of fixing major issues.
    (5)
    Last edited by Valkyrie_Lenneth; 07-03-2021 at 12:50 PM.

  3. #3
    Player KizuyaKatogami's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Posts
    3,472
    Character
    Kizuya Katogami
    World
    Cerberus
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 81
    Quote Originally Posted by Valkyrie_Lenneth View Post
    Criticism is valid whenever a game is in a playable state for testing. I played the "pre-alpha" for Ashes at Pax Prime like.... 2 or 3 years ago. It should be beyond "no criticism stage" by now. The game is outside of the significant design change stage of its development. Just like XIV was during 1.0s alpha and beta. Those criticisms to 1.0 during those stages were definitely valid.

    In fact, its the best time to provide criticism, in case there is even the slightest chance of fixing major issues.
    I agree with you to a degree. I do think its best to critique a game fairly early on because like you said, major issues should be brought to attention as early as possible.The thing i kind of disagree with though is critiquing something without having the full picture. They themselves have said the pvp gameplay and such is something theyre spending a lot of time on. I dont really have a problem with the money nor the time its taking for the mmo to come out because i would rather they take thei time and fine tune things instead of rush it out. I will say the money thing did weird me out at first and almost put me off, but when i saw how dedicated the devs were it kind of put me at ease. I take solace int he fact that they're major nerds and they genuinely do seem to want to create the "perfect" mmo that makes everyone of all different content types happy. A bold effort to be sure but not one i'd say will die off so soon. Im certainly more interested and curious in how it goes that its actually taken my hype away from 6.0.
    (2)

  4. #4
    Player
    ElciaDeiLinus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Limsa
    Posts
    259
    Character
    Elcia Deilinus
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by KizuyaKatogami View Post
    Yes, when criticism is applicable. Not when the game is still in early testing stages. Criticism should also be done only when theres been ample research done for whatever you are critiquing. Yes, LazyPeon's video was poorly done. If you look at my other posts where i've mentioned him, i agree it was bias against 14. That said however...
    I'm looking forward to Ashes- which is why I'd rather have criticism be allowed- it does look to be bad form when people saying that Ashes isn't subject to criticism also lament that FFXIV players don't allow criticism. I'd even say that early testing is when criticism is most valuable because it gives the most time for there to be fixes. Should a game be panned and declared a failure in alpha/beta? No- but criticized? Absolutely.

    As for players in FFXIV- or people using the internet in general- when there's millions of players, and a few of those are extremely awful people- can a great community do anything to stop them? I don't think it's possible. The community can set the tone of what's acceptable- now, if people were doxxing, threatening, casting slurs, stalking openly, harassing people on the forums, etc like we get in WoW... and the community was joining in, that'd be different.

    If we had a situation like we did in WoW where the top guild doxx'd/threatened players in classic and got no punishment from Blizz and no real community pushback- a situation where we know who did it and nobody really cared- I think that'd be very concerning.

    But do we know who threatened the streamers? If they're even in our community and not the streamers? (Asmon, for example, has a group of very vitriolic people who stalk him with ill intent in his own community, as seen from his encounters with stream sniping in Classic)

    Can the community stop those people from making threats? That's always the most important question- what can the community do? Because we aren't all powerful, there are things we as a community can do to make a game far more welcoming, and streamers/SE having zero tolerance for toxicity (watch Zepla's latest vid, she makes it very clear she won't stand for it) are things we can do to make it better. But realistically, nobody can stop individuals from doing awful things. That doesn't make a community bad, that just means that a community can't solve every problem.

    And I think when you have a community that tries hard to be as positive, welcoming and friendly as possible and most love that aspect of the community- and people keep saying the community is awful because there's a few people who do awful things in it, of course people will be unhappy with that.

    Cuz nobody is happy with being blamed for something they didn't do, are against, and have no control over.
    (3)