Parsers add replayability for casual players

[Shurrikhan]

Should a factual statement be viewed as harassment?

Depends. What if I were to approach some woman in the mall and gently inform her that she's ugly? Factual or not it was completely unnecessary and probably a little embarrassing for her.

Let's consider the prior context here:

if you are part of the group your performance by default should be open to criticism.

__________________________________________

Analogous to this would be among a team of models, the majority of which found that one of their members has a waistline of greater circumference than their chest (as, parsers in this context have provided purely numbers, not any pass-fail evaluation--which is still found only in or through the content itself), and whose success is largely dependent upon their, on average, being passably attractive, for which certain ratios between the two areas may be more favorable than others.

:: I.e., let's not suddenly turn a measurement into an evaluation as to provide a straw-man for your pithy retort. A measurement cannot evaluate outside of a given criteria or its context, and this interaction would be among people with shared interests and responsibilities, not strangers.