It's time (Option to Hide other players Glamour)

[SoloWingMetatron]

Some more baseless nonsense about polygons

Just bringing light to the fact your side of the argument is no better or valid than other points posted here that differ to yours. Also I can post and comment where and when I like you have no authority here. So don't presume to know what's up. You also arn't discussing at all...all you are doing is trying to refute other points to try and validate your own. Which what everyone here has been doing at this point in the thread. #ComeThruSelfAwareness

The real T is you'd like to see this feature because you'd like to see this feature....that's great. But you also know it has no impact on game play or performance and certainly know it has no impact in reality. So yes it most definitely is unimportant. The fact you'd happily play 10 more years without it shows you deem it unimportant. #GlameLivesMatter #ClamUpAndGlamUp

[Krotoan]

Just bringing light to the fact your side of the argument is no better or valid than other points posted here that differ to yours. Also I can post and comment where and when I like you have no authority here. So don't presume to know what's up. You also arn't discussing at all...all you are doing is trying to refute other points to try and validate your own. Which what everyone here has been doing at this point in the thread. #ComeThruSelfAwareness

Then you haven't been reading the thread. All you've decided to do is to come in here and act like you've got some sort of authority to shut everyone up for whatever reason. There have been discussions, some blame and moral throwing and some VERY weird side tracks. Go back and read a spell, it's educational.

The real T is you'd like to see this feature because you'd like to see this feature....that's great. But you also know it has no impact on game play or performance and certainly know it has no impact in reality. So yes it most definitely is unimportant. The fact you'd happily play 10 more years without it shows you deem it unimportant. #GlameLivesMatter #ClamUpAndGlamUp

This entire game is unimportant, this doesn't mean we shouldn't discuss or post about wants. None of this NEEDS to happen. Tomorrow the servers could blow up and everyone would continue on with their lives. Keep hashtag twittertrash posting whatever. The fact of the matter is this thread and this discussion matters just as much as any other feature proposal or argument.

At this point it is all circles just like what happens with any long running thread.

The devs can get a good enough idea how well liked this feature would be should it be implemented based on the OP and the 1st No statement, both on page 1.

Let them decide if worth resource costs and for next live letter ask the question for such a feature if they answer it we'll have their stance and can put this thread to rest.

.. why must it stop? Others are joining in with their perspectives and concerns. Yes things are getting repeated but WHY do people keep coming in here and asking for it to cease? This is one thread, no spam. It's not like nobodys discussing the original topic anymore. This hasn't turned into the otter thread or the .. weird left turn the smoking emote thread went.

[SoloWingMetatron]

Snip and dip

True. I have not read the whole thread. Only about half a dozen pages worth. But ain't no body got time for reading through a couple hundred pages, to find the point in this none issue. Exactly, side tracks. Which is what this has all become since I jumped into the frey (big mistake with these forums) and was my soul purpose in my replies with some added hashtags for the giggle.

Oh is it educational?...did your education teach you not to be so incredibly condescending?...see we can all do it. And your boy Theo be talking about attacks?...Where you at Theo?

Your final point is exactly it. The real T and one I can get behind. I shall happily discuss things as they are. But once it becomes about trying to "win" and/or about bizarre sidetracks. Then what is even anymore?

Seriously carby slippers and frog suits be odd and not too my taste. But some peeps like that and to truly tolerate something is not to hide yourself from it. But to allow it to exist around you without you reacting.

[Lauront]

Seriously carby slippers and frog suits be odd and not too my taste. But some peeps like that and to truly tolerate something is not to hide yourself from it. But to allow it to exist around you without you reacting.

It's allowed to exist. What you're equating tolerance to is disabling any negative reaction to something - one can both tolerate it, i.e. allow it to exist, and also want little to do with it. I can both allow it to exist and employ a feature to hide it from my sight. Whilst I don't consider the feature imperative, it would be a nice to have.

[Krotoan]

True. I have not read the whole thread. Only about half a dozen pages worth. But ain't no body got time for reading through a couple hundred pages, to find the point in this none issue. Exactly, side tracks. Which is what this has all become since I jumped into the frey (big mistake with these forums) and was my soul purpose in my replies with some added hashtags for the giggle.

Oh is it educational?...did your education teach you not to be so incredibly condescending?...see we can all do it. And your boy Theo be talking about attacks?...Where you at Theo?

The term you're trying to use is "non-issue", and considering there is this much discussion about it, that can't possibly be the case. I'm going to guess maybe English isn't your first language, which is fine of course but I will say that your assumption I'm being intentionally condescending is incorrect. This is just how I talk. If you want to make claims as you have you really SHOULD read more of the thread and it is very educational, no sarcasm intended. And Theo is not my "boy". I believe there are other threads where we were pretty at odds if you want to check out our particular post histories.

Your final point is exactly it. The real T and one I can get behind. I shall happily discuss things as they are. But once it becomes about trying to "win" and/or about bizarre sidetracks. Then what is even anymore?

When I reply to people arguing morals I have to discuss morals and how they relate. I'm not about to let people steer the conversation away without calling them out on it. I think only a few pages back there was an actual discussion about implementation before we got someone literally making an argument that earlier someone had said nobody would make : "everyone who supports this is a bigot".

Seriously carby slippers and frog suits be odd and not too my taste. But some peeps like that and to truly tolerate something is not to hide yourself from it. But to allow it to exist around you without you reacting.

I tolerate it fine and do not react in the slightest. If someone mentions something that could enhance my enjoyment of the game though, I'll speak up to support it. If you are however asking me to change my actual likes and dislikes.. then who's being intolerant?

[SoloWingMetatron]

The term you're trying to use is "non-issue", and considering there is this much discussion about it, that can't possibly be the case. I'm going to guess maybe English isn't your first language, which is fine of course but I will say that your assumption I'm being intentionally condescending is incorrect. This is just how I talk. If you want to make claims as you have you really SHOULD read more of the thread and it is very educational, no sarcasm intended. And Theo is not my "boy". I believe there are other threads where we were pretty at odds if you want to check out our particular post histories.

Ah so your still going for the extreme condescending approach? Not to fight fire with fire, but It's pretty clear I know Theo ain't your boy and that it is a comment on the fact he jumped to your defense despite you throwing plenty "attacks" yourself. But of course if you werent trying to "win" here you would have acknowledged that part of my post and your attitude.

What was that about rule breaking? Yep I'm the only guilty party here. Sure let's go with that.

Again your final point is exactly it and one I agree with. See how if you just went with that and cut out all the garbage above we'd be happy campers.

[Lauront]

Just bringing light to the fact your side of the argument is no better or valid than other points posted here that differ to yours.

You just made a sweeping statement that both sides are as bad as each other, when as Krotoan said, those who are requesting the feature by and large are just asking for it to be added, only to be met with bad faith responses attributing it to muh bigotry and trying to inject "moral" and political arguments into it. So you're not bringing much to light at all. Quite the opposite.

[SoloWingMetatron]

You just made a sweeping statement that both sides are as bad as each other, when as Krotoan said, those who are requesting the feature by and large are just asking for it to be added, only to be met with bad faith responses attributing it to muh bigotry and trying to inject "moral" and political arguments into it. So you're not bringing much to light at all. Quite the opposite.

I did indeed make a sweeping statement. What you think I'm going to retroactively go through each page in the thread to separate out each individual. To make sure you all know who is being referenced. The sad truth being I knew if I quoted anyone all of a sudden people got an opinion. I quote no one and well, just a few likes here and there. The point which I assumed people would most definitely catch is that. People be trying to refute the other side without actually trying to hear the other side and vice versa. It's lietrally quote after quote which essentially boils down to "how could you say such a thing!?...lemme teel you why you is wrong by telling you, you is wrong. With a dash of patronization and condesation " But my sweeping statement is over the line?