It's time (Option to Hide other players Glamour)

[Wavaryen]

So I feel that we counter the Immersion elements not being a good reason. Any other reasons that you have that we need this said option?


If not, this is case closed right?

[Wavaryen]

Ok, but I don't care what you look like. If you care what I look like that's on you.

I mean it is on us. That is why i want you to not have options to change that. We all play by the same rules after all, and I don't want a wrench to be tossed into the fashion area. I don't want you to have the power to see what I wear unless I pick that. Your choice in it is not needed or wanted. How you perceive my looks is on me.

[Zabuza]

So I feel that we counter the Immersion elements not being a good reason. Any other reasons that you have that we need this said option?


If not, this is case closed right?

No, it is not closed. I can't think of a single instance we fight alongside any NPC with animal suits in the story and have the story itself portray that as a serious scene nor mandatory viewing.

[Kohl]

I suppose nudists should have those same rights of human expression as well then, no? If there's really no limit on this sort of thing.

Why wouldn’t they?

[CelestePinke]

I mean it is on us. That is why i want you to not have options to change that. We all play by the same rules after all, and I don't want a wrench to be tossed into the fashion area. I don't want you to have the power to see what I wear unless I pick that. Your choice in it is not needed or wanted. How you perceive my looks is on me.

I don't care what you look like either. Maybe I don't want see tons of other players wearing what I'm wearing.

[Zabuza]

Why wouldn’t they?

They don't. IRL they get arrested in the US for indecent exposure. Why would the police do that if they were 'just trying to express themselves'?

[Wavaryen]

No, it is not closed. I can't think of a single instance we fight alongside any NPC with animal suits in the story and have the story itself portray that as a serious scene nor mandatory viewing.

I..what...huh? Someone gave you plenty of listing, and heck story events have been outlandish. Also, Silly elements has been part of Final Fantasy History! Are we playing the same game? 0_0

It doesn't matter what reasons people provide, you just brush it off as 'silly' and dismiss it. You're set in your ways and are not seeking to budge, as evidenced by you rushing to claim it as 'case closed'.

I mean if I got a good counter to said reason. I can make that claim about it being silly. I mean, If you are willing to keep saying immersion, after we counter that logic. You are being silly.



At my post limit Q_Q

[Theodric]

So I feel that we counter the Immersion elements not being a good reason. Any other reasons that you have that we need this said option?


If not, this is case closed right?

It doesn't matter what reasons people provide, you just brush it off as 'silly' and dismiss it. You're set in your ways and are not seeking to budge, as evidenced by you rushing to claim it as 'case closed'.

Agreeing to disagree on the matter seems like a wise stance to take.

[testname]

Glamours is big part of the game - relic weapons, pvp armors etc

I can't see Producers to neglect themselves by disabling glams

[Zabuza]

I..what...huh? Someone gave you plenty of listing, and heck story events have been outlandish. Also, Silly elements has been part of Final Fantasy History! Are we playing the same game? 0_0

Hildebrand? Squadrons? I don't do either of those, they are not mandatory. They are not MSQ or dungeons.