Quote Originally Posted by Krotoan View Post
What "counter" reason would you have beyond "revenge"? First of all lots of the people who hate this idea mainly hate it because they don't like the idea someone could be not seeing them as they displayed. you solidify that fact and give them a target and you are pretty much inspiring retaliation. Now if you truly do not wish to party/adventure with those people I would accept a "auto blacklist" everyone who has it enabled so they never end up in your parties so you wouldn't be subjected to what you might consider targeted censoring. If you don't wish to interact with them fine, but painting targets on them is very vindictive.
I'm just saying what's wrong with both having the choice? It's kindof unfair that one side gets to do something while the other one has no say on the matter. I think it'll be the only way to do it without breaking the playerbase into a mad tissy. Beside what would be wrong with the option? Maybe because I don't care either way I don't see it in a bad light. I feel like if people get that option to block glams then other people should know, so either an icon or something so other people have a choice too. Again, from the outburst of this thread there's clearly people on both sides, so lets make them both happy instead of just one side. Tho honestly this thread proves why this will never be a thing anyway so all we're doing is going back and fourth with no middle being reached. On that front... I'm hungry? Pizza?