Quote Originally Posted by Vahlnir View Post
If that was the case we wouldn't have been told "we can't do x because of server limitations" so many times. lol
To be fair a lot of things they said they couldn't do because of server or data communication limitations started being implemented after they changed their servers. Not a lot of people pay attention to it but quality of life patches started to happen more often when they localized the servers and separated hosts according to their designated locations. Then years after that we had another server change with SE expanding their capacity, and we managed to have a lot of quality of life patches after that. So in a sense it's better to use the maybe. "With the current situation, my answer is a no. If X thing change, then it might be possible.". If what they need to implement the missing genders is something they can't consider doing at the moment, then the answer is a no. However if those conditions change in the future, it becomes a maybe.

I just wish they would have been a little bit more transparent with the actual reasoning, because we jumped from "we can't because of lore", to "lore is not really the issue it's diversity", to "diversity was never in question it's actually a team decision", to "too much work not enough time finish both", to "it is what it is just bear with us please". And I think that is what got some people worked up. The reasoning seems to always be something else and is very inconsistent. Just like how the male bunny outfit went from "it takes 6 months to design something unique please wait", to "our male team got replaced with an all female team designing it to cater to the aimed audience", to "here carbon copy of the female version but on the dudes, it took us a year to deliver and it was very hard to design but there is it, enjoy!".