An arguement towards having Healing on DPS

[Archwizard]

If I explain yet again how these things are not the same, I'll simply be repeating myself. Maybe I'll go down this rabbit hole again later, but not right now.

Well then if the first half is too repetitive, please address the second:

Furthermore, the question wasn't "How many bad RDMs have you actually seen," it was "How many bad RDMs have you actually seen ignore their responsibilities as a DPS for extended periods in order to do the incumbent healer's job?"
One or two? Five to ten? Dozens? Hundreds?
Because your argument hinges on a grand number of new players specifically using their late, singular healing ability to attempt to perform an entire other role from a DPS position at a meaningful level, and I find it hard to believe you've seen such an extreme number of confused new players as to justify not giving any more non-emergency healing skills to other jobs -- or in this case with Physick, to justify not buffing an existing skill which, if you were right, would already be subject to exactly the same confusion even after Sastasha.

Because the burden of proof lies on the accuser, and "a relevant number of RDMs are fooled into full-healing outside of emergencies by the presence of Vercure" is not something I can say to be universally true based on experience.