I think I've posted in this before but I'm still anti-unlock.
If you give everyone everything, creativity dies.
I think I've posted in this before but I'm still anti-unlock.
If you give everyone everything, creativity dies.
http://king.canadane.com
It doesn't. It's a completely illogical statement.
By definition, having more options allows for increased creative freedom. Restricting choice only inhibits creativity.
In this sense, it's a matter of fact. Arguments against unlocking the racial clothing shouldn't use illogical structure if they want to be persuasive ones.
There's still somewhat of a lore-related argument: they are Garlean, who seem to be halfway between Hyur and Elezen to begin with - characters might have either race's basic model, and interestingly, both the guy in the second picture and at least one of the other performers on the Prima Vista have what are otherwise Duskwight-specific eye tattoos.
Also it tells us that they've modeled that one style of gear to fit Midlanders, which is a different level of undertaking to making all of the sets for all of the races.
(I'm not saying they shouldn't be unlocked, just that this is not so definitely breaking the lore-rules! Or it is, but sitting on an already blurrier line than there is between most of the other races.)
You're using character models to support lore justification which doesn't really work. Also, aren't Duskwights an Eorzean race? In which case them being Garleans means very little on a lore-front.
That's the strange thing! Why are Garleans using a distinctly Eorzean-Elezen pattern? Is it deliberate? Is it just being recycled as "a decoration" and not meant to relate to Duskwights at all?
Also there does seem to be a "Duskwight" race in Ilsabard - there's Shadowhunter's Elezen companion, and a number of people at the camp they visited at the end of 4.4, including the woman focused on.
I expect they're not actually culturally Duskwights, in the same way Far Eastern Hyur "aren't Midlanders", but they're certainly using Duskwight models.
Last edited by Iscah; 01-01-2019 at 06:56 PM.
It's almost like it's just undergarment with no true cultural worth and are race-locked for arbitrary reasons!
I should expect it's something along those lines, but like you said, that really butchers any cultural, lore justification to keep it locked. Because people without any obvious ties to aforementioned culture are using those designs.I expect they're not actually culturally Duskwights, in the same way Far Eastern Hyur "aren't Midlanders", but they're certainly using Duskwight models.
Fair points on everything else, but I was talking about the tattoos here. Why are they being used by Garleans and are we supposed to read anything into it, or was it just a meaningless decoration they reused because it was "ready to go" instead of making a new design?
(But then again, half the Xaela tribes are wearing Ala Mhigan or Thavnairian gear, so it seems the costumes represent whatever context they've been placed into, rather than being held fast to their original design intent...)
Last edited by Iscah; 01-01-2019 at 07:13 PM.
In the case of the Ivalice NPCs they're also actors and that can factor in too. But it's most likely what you said. Still, the fact remains these models were the ones used, while we very rarely (or at all) see the starting sets, which are the ones with the stronger lore argument
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.