Quote Originally Posted by MOZZYSTAR View Post
I really rather people not see how garbage I am because I already know I'm garbage. >> At least without a parser, they can't tell 100% just how awful I am. |: I don't mind if I could see my own or if people could see their own, but I don't like other people seeing my over all performance number/statistics wise and then judging me and comparing me to others based on that. I think it has a lot of potential for bullying/harassment/exclusion/little-to-no room for growth if consistently excluded, etc.
Why not try and become less garbage then? I don't mean this in a hostile fashion, it's a legitimate question and I'm genuinely curious.

I mean, do you truly believe that you should receive the same rewards/consideration as someone who puts more effort in/is more skilled?

Do you echo that sentiment in the real world? If not, that's awfully hypocritical.

Quote Originally Posted by RuleofThree View Post
I mean... this is what we have to deal with without an in game parser...and you know this griefer has ACT.
Neither of you were really toxic IMO, but if I had to stretch my personal definition I'd argue you were worse (if I am reading it right). You deliberately dragged the fight out with the intent to antagonize another player who had asked you to just reset. Him indicating that you have weak gear/no materia and not having any clears (which I assume is him looking you up on FFLogs) is not toxic, if anything it appears to be an objective factual statement regardless of its negative connotation.

You then assume this player is running ACT based on some arbitrary metric that you yourself developed with no supporting evidence, and then used that to broadly paint an entire subset of players who use the tool successfully and publicly with no issue as toxic.

Now mind you - I'd have supported you trying to solo it, unless it was at a very high HP %, which you indicated it was not.